We know that the default jtreg timeout is 2 minutes and typically
runs with a timeoutfactor of 4 or 10. So the harness "safety net"
is 8 to 20 minutes from jtreg.
It does appear that most of the vmTestbase tests use a 5 minute
waittime. I have seen waittime used in different ways. The one we
saw most recently was waiting for a specific reply that was taking
upwords of 7 minutes handling method exclude filtering. e.g.
600K methods on solaris-sparcv9-debug
I've seen other tests using waittime as a total test timeout.
The jtreg timeout factor has not been applied to the vmTestbase waitime.
The tests have been quickly ported so they can run under jtreg
harness, but have not been converted to use the all the jtreg features.
The purpose of this specific fix is to prevent jtreg from an early
termination at 2 minutes or 8 minutes, when the original waittime
allows for 5 minutes.
Reducing waittime will not speed up the tests. It would probably introduce
more intermittent timeout reports.
On 7/13/18 4:21 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Gary,
It looks like you have properly added timeout=300 wherever we use
-waittime:5. However, I'm not 100% convinced this is always the right
approach. In the bug description you said that -waittime is used as a
timeout for individual operations. However, there could be multiple of
those operations, and they could in sum exceed the 300 second jtreg
timeout you added.
What is the default for -waittime? I'm also guessing that the initial
application of -waittime was never really tuned to the specific tests
and just cloned across most of them. It seems every test either needs
5m or the default, which doesn't really make much sense. If 5m was
really needed, we should have seen a lot of failures when ported to
jtreg, but as far as I know the only reason this issue got on your
radar was due to exclude001 needing 7m. Maybe rather than adding
timeout=300 you should change -waitime to 2m, since other than
exclude001, none of the tests seem to need more than 2m.
Lastly, does timeoutFactor impact -waittime? It seems it should be
applied to it also. I'm not sure if it is.
thanks,
Chris
On 7/13/18 4:29 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
This is a simple update to set the jtreg timeout to match the
internal waittime already being used by these vmTestbase/nsk/jdb tests.
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206013
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gadams/8206013/webrev.00/
