Hi Jc,

Are you waiting for more reviewers?
Otherwise, could you send me a patch for push please?

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/17/18 15:38, Alex Menkov wrote:
The changes look good to me.

--alex

On 07/16/2018 16:10, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi all,

We need at least one more review before pushing it.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/16/18 16:07, JC Beyler wrote:
Hi all,

The CSR has recently been approved, could someone else review the spec update webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8205725/webrev.03/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8205725/webrev.03/>

The associated bug is here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205725 The associated CSR is here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206940

Thanks all!
Jc


On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:27 PM serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com> <serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Hi Jc,

    It looks good to me (including the CSR that I'had already reviewed).
    Thank you for preparing a fix for this issue so quickly!

    Thanks,
    Serguei


    On 7/12/18 13:45, JC Beyler wrote:
    Hi all,

    Could I get a review of an update to the JVMTI Spec for Heap
    Sampling:
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8205725/webrev.03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8205725/webrev.03/>

    The assoicated bug is here:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205725
    The associated CSR is here:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206940

    The basic reasoning of this webrev/bug/CSR is:
    - rate is not the right word and should be renamed to interval,
    this is what provokes the change in the code/tests/API naming.
    - the spec does not mention that the new sampling interval will
    take time to be taken into account (you have to wait for a TLAB
    to be refilled); this adds that precision so that the user is not
    surprised
    - the spec explicitly says that the sampling is done via a
    geometric variable which averages to the sampling interval; it
    was asked to relax this and the spec should just say that the
    sampling is pseudo-random and the interval will average out to
    what the user requested.

    Thanks for all your help,
    Jc



--

Thanks,
Jc


Reply via email to