+1
Thanks,
Serguei
On 8/28/18 16:30, Alex Menkov wrote:
Hi Jc,
Looks good to me.
--alex
On 08/28/2018 14:43, JC Beyler wrote:
Hi all,
Here is another extra small webrev for review where the code handles
the interval 1 differently but this was an artifact of the original
implementation. We could remove the test altogether (the rest of the
code makes the 0 "sample everything" work by side-effect) but for
readability/maintainance, it is best to explicitly test for and
return 0.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8208186/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8208186/webrev.00/>
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208186
Thanks,
Jc
