Looks OK to me.
The extra diagnostic output will be useful to have.

On 8/30/18, 11:08 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
Hi Chris,

It looks good.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 8/29/18 21:19, Chris Plummer wrote:
>/  Hi,
/>/
/>/  Please review the following:
/>/
/>/  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210118
/>/  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8210118/webrev.00/  
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecjplummer/8210118/webrev.00/>
/>/
/>/  There have a been a few jdb bugs (or test bugs) that have caused tests
/>/  to fail because they never get the expected jdb prompt. The only clue
/>/  in the log is an abrupt termination of any jdb output, and the
/>/  following error message:
/>/
/>/  # ERROR: Caught unexpected exception while executing the test:
/>/  nsk.share.Failure: Prompt is not received during 300200 milliseconds.
/>/
/>/  Dumping the pending reply makes it a lot easier to debug most of these
/>/  failures. Here's one example output with the fix in place:
/>/
/>/  Sending command: cont
/>/  receiveReply FAILED due to "nsk.share.Failure: Prompt is not received
/>/  during 300200 milliseconds.".
/>/  Pending reply output follows:
/>/  reply[0]:>
/>/  reply[1]: Breakpoint hit: Arg"thread=main",
/>/  nsk.jdb.locals.locals002.locals002a.allKindsOfLocals(), line=100 bci=62
/>/  reply[2]: umen100           System.out.println("Locals but no
/>/  arguments"); // locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE2
/>/  reply[3]:
/>/  reply[4]: ts bmain[1] ut no locals
/>/  # ERROR: Caught unexpected exception while executing the test:
/>/  nsk.share.Failure: Prompt is not received during 300200 milliseconds.
/>/
/>/  In this case we can see all sorts of extra characters in various reply
/>/  lines. These characters actually come from a println that was executed
/>/  after execution resumed and before the next breakpoint:
/>/
/>/          System.out.println("Arguments but no locals"); //
/>/  locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE1
/>/
/>/  Having the pending reply helps a lot here. Without it, you have no
/>/  idea why the main[1] prompt was never seen and might be led to think
/>/  it was never sent. By looking at the pending output you can see that
/>/  main[1] was sent, but it not being detected because of all the extra
/>/  characters appearing on the same line.
/>/
/>/  thanks,
/>/
/>/  Chris
/>

Reply via email to