Thank you, David! The proposed fix didn't help. It still hangs at some occasions. Additional tracing showed that when jcmd is invoked with the main class name it iterates over all running Java processes and temporary attaches to them to retrieve the main class name. It hangs while trying to attach to one of the running Java processes. There are numerous Java processes running at the host machine some associated with the test framework itself and another with the tests running in parallel. It is not clear what exact is this particular process since the jcmd hangs before retrieving the process' main class name, but after all tests terminated the process with this id is no longer running. I have to revoke this review since more investigation is required.
Best regards, Daniil On 11/11/18, 1:35 PM, "David Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Daniil, I took a quick look at this one ... two minor comments The static class names could just be "Process" as they will acquire the enclosing class name as part of their own name anyway. As it is this gets repeated eg: HelpTest$HelpTestProcess InvalidCommandTest$InvalidCommandTestProcess TestJavaProcess.java: 39 public static void main(String argv[]) { Nit: Should be "String[] argv" in Java style Thanks, David On 10/11/2018 3:18 PM, Daniil Titov wrote: > Please review the change that fixes serviceability/dcmd/framework/* tests from a time out. The fix for JDK-8166642 made serviceability/dcmd/framework/* tests non-concurrent to ensure that they don't interact with each other and there are no multiple tests running simultaneously since all they do share the common main class name com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper. However, it looks like the tests from other directories still might run in parallel with these tests and they also have com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper as a main class. > > The fix ensures that each serviceability/dcmd/framework/* test uses a Java process with a unique main class name when connecting to this process with jcmd and the main class name. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205654 > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8205654/webrev.001/ > > Best regards, > Daniil > >
