Thank you very much for the review, JC. My comments inline.


I saw this potential issue with one of the test conversions:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215568/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/TestPrintMdo.java.udiff.html
    - It seems like there is a missing "unexpected" strings check here no?
       - The original test was doing
-
-                if (line.contains("missing reason for ")) {
-                    unexpected = new RuntimeException("Unexpected msg: missing reason for ");
-                    break;
-                }

whereas the new test is not seemingly (though http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215568/webrev.00/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/TestClhsdbJstackLock.java.udiff.html does do it so I think this is an oversight?).

Thank you very much for pointing this out! This was an oversight. I have added the unexpected strings check.


   - Also interesting is that the original test was trying to find one of X:
-                if (line.contains("VirtualCallData")  ||
-                    line.contains("CounterData")      ||
-                    line.contains("ReceiverTypeData")) {
-                    knownProfileDataTypeFound = true;
-                }

whereas you are now wanting to find all of them. Is that normal/wanted?

I was being extra cautious when I had written this test case in the beginning :-). As far as I have seen, the printmdo output does contain all of these. (The test passes with 50 repeated runs across all hs tiers with the changes -- so I believe it is OK).

I have the new webrev at:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215568/webrev.01/

I have additionally modified the copyright year to 2019.

Thank you,
Jini.



The rest looked good to me, though I wish there were a way to not have to change all the strings to be regex friendly but I fail to see how to do that without writing a runCmdWithoutRegexMatcher, which seems overkill :-)
Jc

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:55 PM Jini George <jini.geo...@oracle.com <mailto:jini.geo...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Hello!

    Requesting reviews for:

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215568/webrev.00/

    BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215568

    No new failures with the SA tests (hs-tiers 1-5) with these changes.
    The
    changes here include:

    * Refactoring the SA tests which test clhsdb commands to use
    ClhsdbLauncher for uniformity and ease of maintainence.
    * Testing for regular expressions with shouldMatch rather than
    shouldContain.
    * Minor cleanups.

    Thank you,
    Jini.




--

Thanks,
Jc

Reply via email to