On 1/02/2019 1:11 am, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
... and the tests passed.
https://ci.sapmachine.io/job/branch-build-linux_x86_64/12/JT_20Report_20hotspot/

Unfortunately one can not see the jtr file to verify the right exception was
thrown.  But they passed, so it's good.

Why do you remove some checks for test failures from some tests?
Like
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbInspect.java
Why won't jstackOutput be null any more after your change?

I don't think it can actually be null before the change: ClhsdbLauncher.run calls ClhsdbLauncher.runCmd which will either throw, or return a non-null (put possibly empty) String.

So that seems like a simple cleanup to me.

Cheers,
David


Others are:
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbJdis.java
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbLongConstant.java
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPrintAs.java
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbRegionDetailsScanOopsForG1.java
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbScanOops.java
   serviceability/sa/ClhsdbThread.java

Are these all failures that go back to the attach issue?

Best regards,
   Goetz.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019 12:54
To: 'Jini George' <jini.geo...@oracle.com>; serviceability-
d...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: JDK-8217473: SA: Tests using ClhsdbLauncher fail on SAP docker
containers

Hi Jini,

I pushed it into our testing:
https://ci.sapmachine.io/view/Build%20My%20Branch/job/branch-build-
service/43/

the build is running ...

Best regards,
   Goetz.

-----Original Message-----
From: serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On
Behalf Of Jini George
Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2019 12:59
To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: JDK-8217473: SA: Tests using ClhsdbLauncher fail on SAP
docker
containers

Requesting reviews for:

BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217473
Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8217473/webrev.01/index.html

The patch includes changes to use SkippedException to skip the tests
when canPtraceAttachLinux() in Platform.java returns false.

Thanks,
Jini.

Reply via email to