Looks good!
dl
On 3/4/19 3:03 PM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Hi Dean,
You are right, test sp06t003 has the same problem. Please, review a new version of the
change that fixes both tests. I checked other tests and no more tests use the this
approach with "commonDepth".
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8218167/webrev.02
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218167
Thanks!
--Daniil
On 3/1/19, 9:14 PM, "serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net on behalf of
dean.l...@oracle.com" <serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net on behalf of
dean.l...@oracle.com> wrote:
Looks good, but what about sp06t003? Doesn't it have the same problem?
Are there any other tests using similar logic?
dl
On 3/1/19 8:33 PM, Daniil Titov wrote:
> Please review the change that fix intermittent failure for test
nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling/SP02/sp02t003 when running with Graal.
>
> The problem with the test here is that method checkThread() looks for the test method in the top
"commonDepth" frames where "commonDepth" is a minimum of "frameCount" (returned by
jvmti->GetFrameCount) and "frameStackSize"( returned by jvmti->GetStackTrace).
>
> If a compilation is triggered between these 2 calls then there are cases when
"frameCount" is 2, "frameStackSize" is 4, and the frame stack is as the
following:
>
> [0] adjustCompilationLevel
> [1] adjustCompilationLevel
> [2] testedMethod
> [3] run
>
> In this case the test looks for the test method only in 2 top frames and
fails.
>
> The fix ensures that the test iterates over all frames in the frame
stack when looking for the test method.
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8218167/webrev.01
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218167
>
> Thanks!
> --Daniil
>
>
