Hi Jc,
I'd suggest to change the bug title to be:
Add a AsyncGetCallTrace test
I'm not sure about the test names.
Maybe, it is Okay to keep the AGCT abbreviation.
But I'd like to hear other opinions.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/30/19 3:47 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
Hi all,
As I start looking at working on the AGCT bugs, I wanted to at least
start creating a baseline of tests for AGCT. This is an attempt to
just have a "base" test (and infrastructure) that tries to call AGCT
and get back some sane information.
Next step will be to add a few more tests that will be exposing the
limitations of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178287 for
example.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8223040/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8223040/webrev.00/>
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223040
This passed the test on my linux machine (the test is only for linux
due to the dlsym) and the submit-repo.
Thanks,
Jc
