Just confirming I'm okay with this too.
David
On 16/05/2019 12:50 pm, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Osamu,
On 5/15/19 19:45, Osamu Sakamoto wrote:
Hi Serguei,
> I'm Okay with the fix.
Thank you for reviewing.
I will request Yasumasa to push webrev.00.1 to jdk/jdk when the status
of CSR changes to Approved
Great!
> But we have to use correct subject line which includes bug number and
> the exact bug title.
> Otherwise, these emails are not searchable by the bug number.
I added bug number and exact bug title to email subject.
Nice.
Thanks,
Serguei
Thanks,
Osamu
On 5/16/19 11:30, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Osamu,
I'm Okay with the fix.
But we have to use correct subject line which includes bug number and
the exact bug title.
Otherwise, these emails are not searchable by the bug number.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 5/15/19 17:57, 坂本 統 wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Do you think which is better, to add angle bracket or not to?
By the way, you've added angle brackets to jhsdb debugd --help in
the CSR.
But current other commands --help don't have it.
I think this modification should be also added to other commands
--help if it is added to debugd --help.
This CSR relates on only debugd, so I think this modification
should be included to the RFE which David filed.(JDK-8223814)
The webrev which is added angle bracket to debugd --help is here.
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8223665/webrev.00.1/>
Thanks,
Osamu
--
NTT コムウェア株式会社
技術企画部技術SE部門OSSセンタ
坂本 統
TEL: 03-6713-3034
MAIL: <[email protected]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Osamu Sakamoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:22 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: 末永 恭正 <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: debugd options should regard to jhsdb style
Hi Serguei,
Thank you for reviewing the CSR.
I answer your questions.
Q1 & Q2: <executable image name> and <path to coredump> can accept
both full path and relative path.
Q3: Other commands (clhsdb/hsdb/jstack/jmap/jinfo/jsnap) currently
have the same format, and need not to be updated.
By the way, you've added angle brackets to jhsdb debugd --help in
the CSR.
But current other commands --help don't have it.
I think this modification should be also added to other commands
--help if it is added to debugd --help.
This CSR relates on only debugd, so I think this modification should
be included to the RFE which David filed.(JDK-8223814) What do you
think about this?
Yasumasa has uploaded webrev.00.1 that angle bracket is added to
debugd --help.
I will request him to push the better one when this is clear
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8223665/webrev.00.1/>
Thanks,
Osamu
On 5/14/19 14:07, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Osamu,
Sorry for reacting on this so late.
This work on cmd-line options unification is very welcome!
I looked at the CSR and it looks pretty good in general.
I've added angle brackets to the jhsdb debugd --help:
|$ jhsdb debugd --help --serverid <unique id for this debug server>
--exe <executable image name> --core <path to coredump> --pid <pid of
process to attach> But this needs to be unified with other commands
|||(clhsdb, hsdb, jstack, etc|), of course. |
Also, added a comment with the questions:
|Q1: Should the <executable image name> be always a full path name
or it
can be a relative path? Q2: Should the <path to coredump> be always a
full path name or it can be a relative path? Q3: Do all other commans
(clhsdb, hsdb, jstack, jmap, etc.) currently have the same format or
they also need to be updated?|
I can update the CSR description if you answer these questions.
They'll file an RFE for this.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 5/13/19 01:06, Osamu Sakamoto wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for updating the CSR.
I agree with filing a RFE to improve the general jhsdb help output.
Could you file the RFE? (I can't access JBS.)
I would like to contribute it if the RFE will be filed.
My proposal (webrev.00) has been reviewed by Yasumasa and JC.
So I will request Yasumasa to push it to jdk/jdk when the status of
CSR changes to Approved, and RFE for jhsdb help is filed.
Thanks,
Osamu
On 5/13/19 16:00, David Holmes wrote:
On 13/05/2019 4:38 pm, Osamu Sakamoto wrote:
Hi, David
I saw your comment in this CSR.
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223666
I understand that the problem is that the help description of
debugd
I proposed and current other modes is not helpful for users.
What should we do to go through this CSR?
IMHO we should update help description of all jhsdb modes more
helpful.
Do you have any ideas about this?
I think a RFE should be filed to improve the general jhsdb help
output, so that it explains that --pid and --exe are mutually
exclusive options. That way this CSR, and thus the associated RFE
can
proceed. I'll add the same info the CSR.
Thanks,
David
Thanks,
Osamu
On 5/10/19 17:46, 坂本 統 wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Yasumasa's opinion in CSR.
I wrote new debugd format and usage to match other modes(jstack,
jmap and so on) in jhdsb.
Certainly, usage of debugd which I proposed does not explain that
<pid> and <exe> cannot be used together, but it is not limited to
debugd - other modes have similar issue.
I think it is helpful to detail help description in each jhsdb
modes, but I'd like to separate as another issue because this is
not limited to debugd.
-----Original Message-----
From: Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 4:08 PM
To: David Holmes <[email protected]>
Cc: Jean Christophe Beyler <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
[email protected]
<[email protected]>; 坂本 統
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: debugd options should regard to jhsdb style
Hi David,
Thank you for checking in CSR, and sorry for my incorrect
description.
I added my opinion to CSR.
Osamu, do you have any opinion?
Yasumasa
2019年5月10日(金) 15:16 David Holmes <[email protected]>:
Hi Yasumasa,
I've made some updates to the CSR request and raised a couple of
issues.
FYI the specification section only needs to contain the actual
specification for what has changed ie the new command-line
options;
not the implementation that will bring about those changes.
Thanks,
David
On 10/05/2019 2:12 pm, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Thanks JC!
I added key point of this change to specification section in
CSR.
Yasumasa
2019年5月10日(金) 12:54 Jean Christophe Beyler
<[email protected]>:
Hi Yasumasa,
I'm not a reviewer but the CSR looks good; I feel that the
specification section could use some text and then send the
reader
to the other bug entry :) Jc
From: Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:06 PM
To: [email protected]
[email protected]
tests on submit repo have been passed
(mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8223665-20190510-0157-2376640)
Could you review the CSR?
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223666
Yasumasa
2019年5月10日(金) 10:20 Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]>:
Hi,
Osamu, your change looks good to me.
I will sponsor you.
David, I filed this issue and requested to CSR:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223665
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223666
I uploaded webrev. I will push it to submit repo.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8223665/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2019/05/10 7:30, David Holmes wrote:
Hi,
This will need a bug filed and a corresponding CSR
request. I
suspect that historically the form of this command was done
to match other tools.
Thanks,
David
On 9/05/2019 6:33 pm, ?? ? wrote:
Hi all,
I want to use `jhsdb debugd` on my laptop.
However debugd mode has different options from other modes.
I think debugd should have same options like other modes.
For example, `jhsdb debugd <pid>` should be `jhsdb debugd
--pid <pid>`.
Also I added `--serverid` option for serverid.
I attached a patch for this enhancement.
This patch passes serviceability/sa jtreg tests.
Testcase for debugd is available as
serviceability/sa/sadebugd/SADebugDTest.java .
However it has been disabled by JDK-8163805.
It will be fixed by Yasumasa Suenaga (ysuenaga) after my
proposal has been merged.
Could you help? I want to contribute it. I need a sponsor.
(My company has signed to OCA (NTT Comware Corporation))
Thanks,
Osamu
--
Thanks,
Jc
