Greetings,

The new test added by this fix has been failing in JDK14 CI:

JDK-8227594 sadebugd/DebugdConnectTest.java fails due to "java.rmi.NotBoundException: SARemoteDebugger"
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227594

The test failure has been happening in Tier[345] so I think
either Serguei or Chris P needs to check this out...

Dan



On 7/10/19 7:15 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Thanks Serguei!

Yasumasa


On 2019/07/11 2:55, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,

Thank you for adding your comment to the CSR!
It looks good to me.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 7/9/19 18:20, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Serguei,

I added a comment that the change from the latest (approved) proposal to the CSR. Could you check it again?

Please tell me if it is not enough.


Thanks,

Yasumasa



2019年7月10日(水) 8:12 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Hi Yasumasa,

    I'd like you to be more precise.
    Providing the webrev, email exchange and saying about help messages is
    not precise.
    It requires some non-trivial extra work.
    Could you add a comment with this:
      What help message has been changed to what?

    Thanks,
    Serguei

    On 7/9/19 3:51 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    > Hi Serguei,
    >
    > I added a comment to the CSR.
    > I've updated help messages in Specification section of the CSR.
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Yasumasa
    >
    >
    > On 2019/07/10 7:42, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
    >> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>
    >> Could you be more precise?
    >> What was the latest change in this CSR?
    >> Could you add it as a comment?
    >> It will safe time for reviewers and approvers.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >> Serguei
    >>
    >> On 7/9/19 3:35 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    >>> Thanks Serguei!
    >>>
    >>> I reopened the CSR and update the description.
    >>> Could you review again it?
    >>>
    >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224979
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> Yasumasa
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 2019/07/10 4:11, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>>>
    >>>> The update looks Okay to me.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>> Serguei
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 7/8/19 4:16 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    >>>>> Thank you Chris!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Serguei, do you agree with this change?
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8209790/webrev.07/
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If you are ok, I will reopen the CSR (JDK-8224979).
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2019-July/028624.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Yasumasa
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 2019/07/09 8:08, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>> Looks good! Sorry about the high number of iterations. I should
    >>>>>> have caught some things sooner.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> thanks,
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On 7/8/19 3:43 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    >>>>>>> Hi Chris,
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Thank you for your comment.
    >>>>>>> I fixed it in new webrev:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8209790/webrev.07/
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Could you check again?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Yasumasa
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On 2019/07/09 4:11, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Sorry, just noticed one other thing:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>     <--core --exe> and <--pid> and <--connect> are mutually
    >>>>>>>>> exclusive.
    >>>>>>>> I'm not sure why you are using angled brackets here. It's not     >>>>>>>> done in other parts of the help output that reference options
    >>>>>>>> by name. Also, no need to mention --exe since there is an
    >>>>>>>> earlier comment in the help saying in must be used together     >>>>>>>> with --core. This should help to simplify the help message. I
    >>>>>>>> would suggest:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>      --core, --pid, and --connect are mutually exclusive.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> There's also a typo in the version of the help that does not
    >>>>>>>> include --connect:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>    76 System.out.println(" <--core --exe> and <--pid> are
    >>>>>>>> mutually eexclusive.");
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Notice "eexclusive".
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Otherwise it looks good.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> thanks,
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On 7/8/19 5:06 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    >>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> I uploaded new webrev:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8209790/webrev.06/
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> It shows help messages as below:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> ```
    >>>>>>>>> $ jhsdb jstack --help
    >>>>>>>>> --locks                 To print java.util.concurrent locks.
    >>>>>>>>> --mixed                 To print both Java and native
    >>>>>>>>> frames (mixed mode).
    >>>>>>>>>     --pid <pid>             To attach to and operate on the
    >>>>>>>>> given live process.
    >>>>>>>>>     --core <corefile>       To operate on the given core file.
    >>>>>>>>>     --exe <executable for corefile>
    >>>>>>>>>     --connect [<id>@]<host> To connect to a remote debug
    >>>>>>>>> server (debugd).
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>     The --core and --exe options must be set together to give
    >>>>>>>>> the core
    >>>>>>>>>     file, and associated executable, to operate on. They can use
    >>>>>>>>>     absolute or relative paths.
    >>>>>>>>>     The --pid option can be set to operate on a live process.
    >>>>>>>>>     The --connect option can be set to connect to a debug
    >>>>>>>>> server (debugd).
    >>>>>>>>>     <--core --exe> and <--pid> and <--connect> are mutually
    >>>>>>>>> exclusive.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>     Examples: jhsdb jstack --pid 1234
    >>>>>>>>>           or  jhsdb jstack --core ./core.1234 --exe ./myexe
    >>>>>>>>>           or  jhsdb jstack --connect debugserver
    >>>>>>>>>           or  jhsdb jstack --connect id@debugserver
    >>>>>>>>> ```
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Yasumasa
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On 2019/07/08 16:14, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I meant "jhsdb debugd", not "clhsdb debugd".
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/19 12:09 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed one more thing:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>   65 System.out.println(" --connect <[id@]host>
    >>>>>>>>>>> To connect to a remote debug server (sadebugd).");
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Earlier on I incorrectly said that jstack and other tools     >>>>>>>>>>> had a references to "sadebugd" in the help output. It is     >>>>>>>>>>> actually "jsadebugd". But that was the name of the command     >>>>>>>>>>> line tool, which is now gone. Instead now we have "clhsdb
    >>>>>>>>>>> debugd ...", so maybe it should just mention "debugd".
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/7/19 10:24 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> I think it should be "[<id>@]<host>". Angle brackets are     >>>>>>>>>>>> used to indicate non-literal values (ones to be replaced by
    >>>>>>>>>>>> something the user chooses), but the '@' is a literal
    >>>>>>>>>>>> value, so should not be enclosed in the angle brackets.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Also one minor thing. You ended up duplicating the //:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>   60 // // --connect <[id@]host>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/19 5:55 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your advise.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> I uploaded new webrev. How about this?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8209790/webrev.04/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> I replaced "server" to "host" as you said.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other comments from you also have been fixed in it.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, `jhsdb jstack --help` shows as below:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> $ jhsdb jstack --help
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --locks                 To print java.util.concurrent
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> locks.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --mixed                 To print both Java and native
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> frames (mixed mode).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --pid <pid>             To attach to and operate on
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> the given live process.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --core <corefile>       To operate on the given core
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> file.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --exe <executable for corefile>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> --connect <[id@]host>   To connect to a remote debug
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> server (sadebugd).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> The --core and --exe options must be set together to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> give the core
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> file, and associated executable, to operate on. They
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> can use
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> absolute or relative paths.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> The --pid option can be set to operate on a live process.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> The --connect option can be set to connect to a debug
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> server (sadebugd).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> <--core --exe> and <--pid> and <--connect> are exclusive.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Examples: jhsdb jstack --pid 1234
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> or jhsdb jstack --core ./core.1234 --exe ./myexe
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> or jhsdb jstack --connect debugserver
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> or jhsdb jstack --connect id@debugserver
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are ok, I will reopen CSR (JDK-8224979).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yasumasa
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019/07/06 6:26, Chris Plummer wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/19 3:53 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019/07/05 4:24, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/4/19 5:30 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019/07/04 8:07, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall these changes look good, but I think there is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit of cleanup still needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've changed the indentation of the help to always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a few spaces before the /t. If you are going to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do this, then perhaps you don't need the /t anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I will replace '\t' to whitespace.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 3 checks for "remote != null". Shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they be "remote != NO_REMOTE"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The old jstack help output is a bit more informative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than your output:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      jstack [-m] [-l] [server_id@]<remote server IP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or hostname>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          (to connect to a remote debug server)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      --connect <[id@]server> To operate on the remote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debug server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More specifically, you replaced <remote server IP or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hostname> with "server". I think the former is a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more self explanatory.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly, but it is too long to show on the console.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I used short word: server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we can ignore long line, or can add newline (\n) on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help message,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can change it. What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see why not. Isn't there already help output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that relies on newlines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see on the CSR (JDK-8224979), format of jhsdb
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help messages is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <option name> <blank (includes tab)> <description>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thus I think long option / description is not comfortable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we need to describe more, I think we should write it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --connect <[server-id@]remote server IP or hostname>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       To connect to a remote debug server.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yasumasa,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We already have multiline examples like:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> |--pid <pid> To attach to and operate on the given live
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> process.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is your concerned that the long option name will extend     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the columns where the description normally is? If     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so, you can start the description on a new line as you     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest, or maybe come up with a different name for the     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> option that isn't quite as long. My main objection to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just saying "server" is it in no way conveys we are
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> talking about an IP host. Even just saying <host> would     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be better. It is also more correct since the host isn't     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily what someone would consider to be a server     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (it could just be someone's desktop). <server-id> on the     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other hand is the correct term because we are talking     >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the id of the debug server running on a particular
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> host.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>
    >>




Reply via email to