Please, review a trivial fix for the doc bug:
  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229847

The patch is:

diff --git a/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java b/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java --- a/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java +++ b/src/jdk.attach/share/classes/com/sun/tools/attach/spi/AttachProvider.java
@@ -46,16 +46,16 @@
  * <p> An attach provider implementation is typically tied to a Java virtual   * machine implementation, version, or even mode of operation. That is, a specific
  * provider implementation will typically only be capable of attaching to
- * a specific Java virtual machine implementation or version. For example, Sun's + * a specific Java virtual machine implementation or version. For example, Oracle's   * JDK implementation ships with provider implementations that can only attach to
- * Sun's <i>HotSpot</i> virtual machine. In general, if an environment
+ * Oracle's <i>HotSpot</i> virtual machine. In general, if an environment
  * consists of Java virtual machines of different versions and from different
  * vendors then there will be an attach provider implementation for each
  * <i>family</i> of implementations or versions.
  *
  * <p> An attach provider is identified by its {@link #name <i>name</i>} and   * {@link #type <i>type</i>}. The <i>name</i> is typically, but not required to - * be, a name that corresponds to the VM vendor. The Sun JDK implementation, + * be, a name that corresponds to the VM vendor. The Oracle JDK implementation,   * for example, ships with attach providers that use the name <i>"sun"</i>. The   * <i>type</i> typically corresponds to the attach mechanism. For example, an   * implementation that uses the Doors inter-process communication mechanism


Summary:
  The AttachProvider spec became a little obsolete.
  It should not refer to Sun implementation.
  The fix is to replace 'Sun' with 'Oracle' in 3 places.
  I don't think we need a CSR for this doc change.


Thanks,
Serguei

Reply via email to