Hi Martin,

It looks good to me.

Thanks,
Serguei


On 2/24/20 05:51, Doerr, Martin wrote:

Hi,

 

reposting on serviceability-dev (was core-libs-dev before).

 

Bug:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239856

 

Webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8239856_win32_long_double_align/webrev.00/

 

Thanks for the review, Thomas!

 

Best regards,

Martin

 

 

From: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Montag, 24. Februar 2020 14:41
To: Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com>
Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>
Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8239856: [ntintel] asserts about copying unaligned array element

 

Oh okay. Then it looks okay to me.

 

Cheers, Thomas

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:56 PM Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com> wrote:

Hi Thomas,

 

thanks for the quick review.

 

ATTRIBUTE_ALIGNED is defined in hotspot. I can’t use it for src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/ArrayReferenceImpl.c.

 

Christoph had already suggested to make it available for core libs, too, but I haven’t found a good place for it.

 

Best regards,

Martin

 

 

From: Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Montag, 24. Februar 2020 12:52
To: Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com>
Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>
Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8239856: [ntintel] asserts about copying unaligned array element

 

Hi Martin,

 

maybe use ATTRIBUTE_ALIGNED instead?

 

Cheers, Thomas

 

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:44 PM Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com> wrote:

Hi,

 

we had fixed stack array alignment for Windows 32 bit with JDK-8220348.

However, there are also stack allocated jlong and jdouble used as source for SetLongArrayRegion and SetDoubleArrayRegion with insufficient alignment for this platform.

 

Here’s my proposed fix:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8239856_win32_long_double_align/webrev.00/

 

Please review.

 

Best regards,

Martin

 


Reply via email to