Sorry it is still crashing.
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007f98ec01e94e, pid=13702, tid=13704
#
# JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (15.0) (fastdebug build
15-internal+0-2020-03-16-0640217.suenaga.source)
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug
15-internal+0-2020-03-16-0640217.suenaga.source, mixed mode, sharing,
tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# C [libsaproc.so+0x494e] DwarfParser::process_dwarf(unsigned long)+0x4e
#
Same as before.
David
-----
On 16/03/2020 4:57 pm, David Holmes wrote:
On 16/03/2020 4:51 pm, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
On 2020/03/16 15:43, Chris Plummer wrote:
BTW, if you submit it to the submit repo, we can then go and run
additional internal tests (and even more builds) using that job.
Thanks for that tip Chris!
I've pushed the change to submit repo, but I've not yet received the
result.
I will share you when I get job ID.
We can see the id. Just need to wait for the builds to complete before
submitting the additional tests.
David
Yasumasa
Chris
On 3/15/20 11:36 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for testing it.
I updated webrev to avoid bailout to Java frame when DWARF has
language personality routine or LSDA.
Could you try it?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8240956/webrev.01/
It works well on my Fedora 31 and Oracle Linux 7.7 .
I've pushed it to submit repo.
Diff from webrev.00 is here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/submit/rev/6f11cd275652
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2020/03/16 13:12, David Holmes wrote:
Correction ...
On 16/03/2020 12:53 pm, David Holmes wrote:
On 16/03/2020 12:17 pm, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
I can't review this as I know nothing about the code, but I'm
putting the patch through our internal testing.
Sorry but the crashes still exist:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fcdd403894e, pid=16948, tid=16949
#
# JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (15.0) (fastdebug
build 15-internal+0-2020-03-16-0214474.david.holmes.jdk-dev)
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug
15-internal+0-2020-03-16-0214474.david.holmes.jdk-dev, mixed mode,
sharing, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# C [libsaproc.so+0x494e] DwarfParser::process_dwarf(unsigned
long)+0x4e
in fact they seem worse as the test seems to always crash now.
Not worse - sorry. I see 6 failures out of 119 runs of the test in
linux-x64. I don't see a pattern as to where it fails versus passes.
It doesn't fail for me locally.
David
David
David
On 14/03/2020 11:35 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this change:
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240956
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8240956/webrev.00/
JDK-8234624 introduced DWARF parser in SA for unwinding native
frames in jstack mixed mode.
However some error has seen intermittently after that.
I investigated the cause of this, I found two concerns:
A: lack of buffer (.eh_frame section data) range check
B: Language personality routine and Language Specific Data
Area (LSDA) are not considered
I addd range check for .eh_frame processing, and ignore
personality routine and LSDA in this webrev.
Also I added bailout code if DWARF processing is failed due to
these concerns.
This change has passed all tests on submit repo
(mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8240956-20200313-1518-9434671),
also I tested it on my Fedora 31 box and Oracle Linux 7.7
container.
Thanks,
Yasumasa
