Hi Chris,
I agree with you. I will change the test to retry just once.
Thank you,
Daniil
From: Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2020 at 1:27 PM
To: Daniil Titov <daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com>, "serguei.spit...@oracle.com"
<serguei.spit...@oracle.com>, serviceability-dev
<serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8242239: [Graal] javax/management/generified/GenericTest.java
fails: FAILED: queryMBeans sets same
Hi Daniil,
I think a retry count more in line with our current expectations would make
more sense since it is deterministic how many retries are might actually be
needed. You just used a large number in case more “lazy-registered” mbeans are
added in the future, but if this is the case then maybe even 10 is not enough.
thanks,
Chris
On 4/24/20 12:36 PM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Hi Serguei and Chris,
Thank you for your comments.
I wanted to make the fix more generic and not limit it just to Graal
management bean. In this case we could expect that after the first retry is
triggered by Graal MBean registration some other “lazy-registered” MBean got
registered and the test might fail. To avoid this we need to allow test to make
at least several retry attempts before failing. If number 10 looks as too high
we could make it 5 or even 3. This should not affect the test run-time unless
the test starts failing for some other reason than we expect. In the new
webrev I will also correct the iteration counting (as Chris mentioned) and fix
typos.
Thanks again,
Daniil
From: "serguei.spit...@oracle.com" <serguei.spit...@oracle.com>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2020 at 11:48 AM
To: Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com>, Daniil Titov
<daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com>, serviceability-dev
<serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8242239: [Graal] javax/management/generified/GenericTest.java
fails: FAILED: queryMBeans sets same
Hi Daniil,
Besides what Chris is pointed out the fix looks good.
Minor:
97 while(true) {
113 if(mbeanCount * 2 == counterCount || retryCounter++ >
MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPT) {
114 assertEquals(mbeanCount * 2, counterCount);
Space is missed in while and if.
I doubt, the assert is really needed.
96 // is running ( e.g. Graal MBean). In this case just retry the
test.
Extra space before "e.g.".
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/24/20 11:30, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Daniil,
84 // If new MBean (e.g. Graal MBean) is registred while the test
is running names1,
106 // If new MBean (e.g. Graal MBean) is registred while the test
is running mbeans1,
registred -> registered
',' after "running"
Just wondering how you chose 10 as the number of retries. Seems excessive.
Shouldn't the problem turn up at most 1 time and therefore only 1 retry is
needed.
76 int counter = 0;
86 if (sameSize(names1, names2, names3) || counter++ >
MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS) {
The way the checks are done you will actually end up retrying
MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS+1 times. For example, if MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS is 1, first time
through the loop counter is 0 so a retry is allowed. Second time through the
loop counter is 1, so a retry is allowed again.
thanks,
Chris
On 4/18/20 11:30 AM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Please review the change that fixes the failure of
javax/management/generified/GenericTest.java and
javax/management/query/CustomQueryTest.java tests when Graal is on.
The tests checks that calls of management API are consistent and return the
same set of MBeans. However,
when Graal is on the Graal MBean might be registered between the calls that in
turn makes the results
inconsistent and the tests fail.
The fix makes the test aware that some MBean might be registered while the
checks run and if it happens the tests repeat the check.
Testing : Mach5 tests with Graal on and tier1-tier3 tests passed.
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8242239/webrev.01/
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242239
Thanks,
Daniil
