Hi Serguei and Alex, Please review a new version of the webrev [1] that includes the changes Serguei suggested. This version also has new test renamed from DefaultMethods.java to OverpassMethods.java to avoid warnings during the build about conflict with native library for runtime/jni/8033445/DefaultMethods.java test.
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.04/ Thank you, Daniil From: "serguei.spit...@oracle.com" <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 10:53 PM To: Daniil Titov <daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com>, Alex Menkov <alexey.men...@oracle.com>, serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: RFR: 8216324: GetClassMethods is confused by the presence of default methods in super interfaces Hi Daniil, Thank you for the update! It looks good to me. Just two more minor comments and no need for another webrev you address them. 2519 int skipped = 0; // skip default methods Saying "overpass methods" would be more precise. 47 printf("Enabled capability: maintain_original_method_order: true\n"); It is better to get rid of ": true" at the end (sorry, I missed this in my previous suggestion). Enabling capability means it is set to true. Thanks, Serguei On 7/21/20 20:25, Daniil Titov wrote: Hi Serguei and Alex, Please, review new version of the change [1] that includes changes as Serguei suggested. 114 default void default_method() { } // should never be seen The comment above is not clear. Should never be seen in what context? This method should not be included in the list of methods GetClassMethods returns for the sub-interface or implementing class. I don't think we want to comment each method in the test interfaces declared in this test when they should be seen in this test and when they should not. This information already exists in getclmthd007.cpp, thus I decided to omit this comment. Please see below the output from the new test. <skipped> ----------messages:(4/215)---------- command: main -agentlib:DefaultMethods DefaultMethods reason: User specified action: run main/othervm/native -agentlib:DefaultMethods DefaultMethods Mode: othervm [/othervm specified] elapsed time (seconds): 0.241 ----------configuration:(0/0)---------- ----------System.out:(3/265)---------- Reflection getDeclaredMethods returned: [public abstract java.lang.String DefaultMethods$Child.method2()] JVMTI GetClassMethods returned: [public abstract java.lang.String DefaultMethods$Child.method2()] Test passed: Got expected output from JVMTI GetClassMethods! ----------System.err:(1/15)---------- STATUS:Passed. <skipped> ----------messages:(4/276)---------- command: main -agentlib:DefaultMethods=maintain_original_method_order DefaultMethods reason: User specified action: run main/othervm/native -agentlib:DefaultMethods=maintain_original_method_order DefaultMethods Mode: othervm [/othervm specified] elapsed time (seconds): 0.25 ----------configuration:(0/0)---------- ----------System.out:(4/322)---------- Enabled capability: maintain_original_method_order: true Reflection getDeclaredMethods returned: [public abstract java.lang.String DefaultMethods$Child.method2()] JVMTI GetClassMethods returned: [public abstract java.lang.String DefaultMethods$Child.method2()] Test passed: Got expected output from JVMTI GetClassMethods! ----------System.err:(1/15)---------- STATUS:Passed. [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.02/ Thanks, Daniil From: mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com Date: Monday, July 20, 2020 at 6:48 PM To: Alex Menkov mailto:alexey.men...@oracle.com, Daniil Titov mailto:daniil.x.ti...@oracle.com, serviceability-dev mailto:serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: 8216324: GetClassMethods is confused by the presence of default methods in super interfaces Hi Daniil, The fix looks pretty good to me. Just minor comments. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.01/src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp.frames.html 2519 int skipped = 0; // skip default methods from superinterface (see JDK-8216324) You can say just: // skip overpass methods There is probably no need to list the bug number. 2523 // Depending on can_maintain_original_method_order capability 2524 // use the original method ordering indices stored in the class, so we can emit 2525 // jmethodIDs in the order they appeared in the class file 2526 // or just copy in any order Could you, please re-balance the comment a little bit? Also, the comment has to be terminated with a dot. Replace: "or just copy in any order" => "or just copy in current order". http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.01/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetClassMethods/getclmthd007.java.frames.html 114 default void default_method() { } // should never be seen The comment above is not clear. Should never be seen in what context? 117 interface OuterInterface1 extends DefaultInterface { An extra space before "extends". http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.01/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GetClassMethods/InterfaceDefMethods.java.html I like the test simplicity. Default methods are always in interfaces. I'd suggest to rename the test to something like: DefaultMethods.java or OverpassMethods.java. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.01/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GetClassMethods/libInterfaceDefMethods.cpp.html 44 if (options != NULL && strcmp(options, "maintain_original_method_order") == 0) { 45 printf("maintain_original_method_order: true\n"); ... 54 } else { 55 printf("maintain_original_method_order: false\n"); I'd suggest to remove the lines 54 and 55 and adjust the line 45: printf("Enabled capability: maintain_original_method_order: true\n"); 88 jobject m = env->ToReflectedMethod(klass, methods[i], (modifiers & 8) == 8); It is better to replace 8 with a symbolic constant. Thanks, Serguei On 7/20/20 16:57, Alex Menkov wrote: Looks good to me :) Thanks for handling this. --alex On 07/20/2020 12:00, Daniil Titov wrote: Please review change [1] that fixes GetClassMethods behavior in cases if a default method is present in a super interface. Currently for such cases the information GetClassMethods returns for the sub-interface or implementing class incorrectly includes inherited not default methods. The fix ( thanks to Alex for providing this patch) ensures that overpass methods are filtered out in the returns. The fix also applies a change in the existing test as David suggested in the comments to the issue [2]. Testing: Mach5 tier1-tier3 tests successfully passed. [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8216324/webrev.01/ [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216324 Thank you, Daniil
