On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:32:07 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The field will remain for now, but the plan is to refactor it into a new >> class. The new class is not needed by the SA >> and I would really like to avoid having to add unused and untested code to >> the SA. To simplify this coming change I >> want to remove this from the SA straight away. Even without this coming >> change I would vote for removing this type of >> unused code from the SA. I don't think being able to dump the value is worth >> enough compared to the maintenance cost of >> keeping it in. > > Ok. If the field is going away eventually then you can remove it now. Awesome, thanks for reviewing. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/408
