On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 00:25:52 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I tried to run testing with latest changes and latest JDK and build failed: > src/hotspot/share/runtime/escapeBarrier.cpp:310:35: error: no matching > function for call to > 'StackFrameStream::StackFrameStream(JavaThread*&)' 310 | StackFrameStream > fst(deoptee); I noticed this too. I wanted to test with ZGC before pushing the small fix. Unfortunately I get # Internal Error (/priv/d038402/git/reinrich/jdk_ea_new/src/hotspot/share/runtime/stackWatermark.inline.hpp:67), pid=90890, tid=90912 # assert(processing_started()) failed: Processing should already have started [...] Current thread (0x00007f749c25b1c0): JavaThread "JDWP Transport Listener: dt_socket" daemon [_thread_in_vm, id=90912, stack(0x00007f7474c9f000,0x00007f7474da0000)] _threads_hazard_ptr=0x00007f749c2b00c0, _nested_threads_hazard_ptr_cnt=0 Stack: [0x00007f7474c9f000,0x00007f7474da0000], sp=0x00007f7474d9c240, free space=1012k Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code) V [libjvm.so+0x15b3255] StackWatermarkSet::on_iteration(JavaThread*, frame const&)+0xa5 V [libjvm.so+0xa1024f] frame::sender(RegisterMap*) const+0x13f V [libjvm.so+0xa048f8] frame::real_sender(RegisterMap*) const+0x18 V [libjvm.so+0x176261b] vframe::sender() const+0xeb V [libjvm.so+0x16cd56b] JavaThread::last_java_vframe(RegisterMap*)+0x5b V [libjvm.so+0xfa7a56] JvmtiEnvBase::vframeFor(JavaThread*, int)+0x46 V [libjvm.so+0xfab8e5] JvmtiEnvBase::check_top_frame(JavaThread*, JavaThread*, jvalue, TosState, Handle*)+0x1f5 V [libjvm.so+0xfac13e] JvmtiEnvBase::force_early_return(JavaThread*, jvalue, TosState)+0x15e V [libjvm.so+0xf36fa8] jvmti_ForceEarlyReturnLong+0x258 C [libjdwp.so+0xa8b3] forceEarlyReturn+0x293 C [libjdwp.so+0x12945] debugLoop_run+0x1f5 C [libjdwp.so+0x25bb3] attachThread+0x33 V [libjvm.so+0xfcf524] JvmtiAgentThread::call_start_function()+0x1d4 V [libjvm.so+0x16cc8f7] JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x247 V [libjvm.so+0x16d1ce8] Thread::call_run()+0xf8 V [libjvm.so+0x12dd75e] thread_native_entry(Thread*)+0x10e In the test case `EAForceEarlyReturnOfInlinedMethodWithScalarReplacedObjectsReallocFailure` of the new test `jdk/com/sun/jdi/EATests.java` So far I do not have an indication that the failure is caused by this change but when I run the test with -XX:-DoEscapeAnalysis then the test succeeds. I need to look more into it. Wish I was a ZGC expert :) Anyway I pushed the build fix. Tests succeed with default GC. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/119
