On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:58:01 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> timestamp 05.11.2020 19:54:13.100 EST >> >> This is what I get (in a small test program) for 100 ms with the existing >> code. Is this not right? > > char tmp[10 + 1]; > snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "%.3d", millisecs); > snprintf(tbuf, ltbuf, "%s.%s %s", timestamp_date_time, tmp, > timestamp_timezone); > This also gets the same thing. The concern is when it is less than 100ms. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1067
