On 10/11/2020 12:35 pm, Daniel D.Daugherty wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:15:19 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcu...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

The loop that was being discussed here is the one on line 93 of the original 
changeset:
`while (next != NULL && next->is_being_async_deflated()) {`
I made no comment on the outer while loop.

You're correct. I got confused by the line renumbering due to other changes.
Fortunately, the outer while loop can also correctly and easily be changed
into a do-while loop so I'll keep that change. I'm looking at the correct inner
while loop now.

The inner while loop is now converted into a do-while loop.

There was a little more to it than just that, but nevermind I think I see why next_next is needed, so lets move on.

Thanks,
David

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/642

Reply via email to