On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:35:50 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I typically use size_t for entities that can scale with the size of the >> machine's memory, so I don't have to think about whether there are enough >> bits. Could AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate be uintx instead of intx? And then >> maybe we don't need to declare a range, as the natural range of the uintx >> seems perfectly valid. > > I'm pretty sure I copied the decl for AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate > from some other already existing option. That's SOP for me anyway... > If we make any more changes here it will have to be in a follow up. Filed the following new RFE: JDK-8256307 cleanup AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate and _in_use_list_ceiling types https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256307 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/642