On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:35:50 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcu...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> I typically use size_t for entities that can scale with the size of the 
>> machine's memory, so I don't have to think about whether there are enough 
>> bits. Could AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate be uintx instead of intx? And then 
>> maybe we don't need to declare a range, as the natural range of the uintx 
>> seems perfectly valid.
>
> I'm pretty sure I copied the decl for AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate
> from some other already existing option. That's SOP for me anyway...
> If we make any more changes here it will have to be in a follow up.

Filed the following new RFE:
    JDK-8256307 cleanup AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate and _in_use_list_ceiling 
types
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256307

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/642

Reply via email to