On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:03:08 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. >> >> If jdwp.spec has to move to the src tree then src/java.se is probably the >> most suitable home because Java SE specifies JDWP as an optional interface. >> So nothing to do with java.base and the build will need to continue to >> generate the sources for the front-end (jdk.jdi) and back-end >> (jdk.jdwp.agent) as they implement the protocol. > > My understanding of JEPs is that they should be viewed as living documents. > In this case, I think it's perfectly valid to update JEP 201 with additional > source code layout. Both for this and for the other missing dirs. Regarding the chosen layout. Did you consider following the existing pattern of src/<module>/{share,<OS>}/data? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1611