On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:15:40 GMT, Igor Veresov <ivere...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/compiler/compilerDefinitions.cpp line 62:
>>
>>> 60: }
>>> 61: } else if (strcmp(CompilationMode, "high-only") == 0) {
>>> 62: if (!CompilerConfig::has_c2() &&
>>> !CompilerConfig::is_jvmci_compiler()) {
>>
>> Is using `!is_c2_or_jvmci_compiler_available()` better here? All flags
>> should be processed at this point. And we could have some
>> `TieredStopAtLevel` flags.
>> It looks like you have cross dependency between CompilerConfig and
>> CompilationModeFlag which make using `is_c2_or_jvmci_compiler_available()`
>> impossible here.
>
> Yes, there is an unfortunate cross dependency. It would probably work fine
> since ```_mode``` is initialized to ```NORMAL``` before parsing the flag. But
> I wanted to not use any function that would depend on the value of the
> ```_mode``` during parsing. It could create trouble in the future. I'll put
> more comments about that.
okay.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1985
