On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:39:46 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Dear All, 
>>      I am going to create a CSR for the new internal command "dumpheapext", 
>> one problem is that seem if a new CSR is created, this PR will depends on 2 
>> CSRs, I am not sure is this reasonable?  Thanks!
>
>>  I am going to create a CSR for the new internal command "dumpheapext", one 
>> problem is that seem if a new CSR is created, this PR will depends on 2 
>> CSRs, I am not sure is this reasonable? Thanks!
> 
> I have no idea if you can add two CSRs to a PR and a CR. If you can, then I 
> see no issue with doing that. If not, we might need to talk to the CSR 
> committee to see how best to handle it.

> CSR requests are associated with a JBS issue not a PR. If there exists a CSR 
> request for this JBS issue and you are making further changes then move the 
> CSR back to draft and update it and re-submit it.
>
>Thanks,
>David 

The complexity comes from the fact there there are really two separate features 
to call out. One is adding the `parallel=<n>` option to `jmap -dump`, and the 
other is adding the `dumpheapext` command to the attach api. However, they are 
not really separable since `dumpheapext` is needed in order to support 
`parallel=<n>`.  We could lump them into one CR and CSR, but it seems this is 
overloading them a bit. I guess the other option is to try to separate the 
`dumpeheapext` part and do that first, although it really would serve no 
purpose until `parallel=<n>` is added.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2261

Reply via email to