On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 20:23:01 GMT, Chris Plummer <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, we have three PRs related to `parallel=<n>`. I think it would be best to > hold off pushing any of them until they have all been reviewed and approved. > One reason is because the `parallel=<n>` output should be consistent for all > of them, and if there is a minor suggestion for a change in one, it should be > applied to all 3. Sure, will hold off. Summarize the help messages as below: "Number of parallel threads to use for heap inspection. " "0: let the VM determine the number of threads to use. " "1: use one thread, i.e. disable parallelism. " "n: Request that threads be used. n must be positive. The VM will try to use n threads, but might use fewer threads than n." ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2379
