On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:43:04 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> It looks good to me.
>> One side comment about the test. It is not easy to read the code with the 
>> same pattern (e.g. "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream") repeated several 
>> times. I understand, you prefer to make it more explicit but it'd be more 
>> readable if a predefined pattern is used like below:
>>     String pattern = "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream";
>> +            expStrMap.put(cmd, List.of("instance of Oop for java/lang/Class 
>> @ " + examineResult,
>> +                                       "in: " + pattern + @"));
>> . . .
>> +            unexpStrMap.put(cmd, List.of(
>> +                    "instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ "  + 
>> examineResult + " @ " + examineResult,
>> +                    "in: " + pattern + " .* " + pattern));
>> 
>> Just an opinion with no pressure. It is up to you.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>
> Good idea. I've added the pattern strings. Thanks!

That's great, much more readable output!
Looks good.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582

Reply via email to