On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:50:24 GMT, Igor Veresov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Will change.
>
> I'd be better to change the logic to check if the counter is ```>= 
> InvocationCounter::count_limit``` then it's in overflow.

With overflow I do not mean "counter overflow" as it is used to trigger 
compiler activities but plain simple "range of singed int exceeded". Should I 
use different wording? E.g. "counter in signed int overflow"?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2511

Reply via email to