On Tue, 25 May 2021 21:46:27 GMT, Hao Tang <github.com+7947546+tanghaot...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> OperatingSystemImpl.getCpuLoad() may return 1.0 in a container, even though >> the CPU load is obviously below 100%. >> >> We created a 5-core container and run 4 "while (true)" loops in the >> container. OperatingSystemImpl.getCpuLoad() returned 1.0, which is incorrect >> (0.8 is correct). >> "systemLoad" in getCpuLoad() is exactly 4.0 before "systemLoad = >> Math.min(1.0, systemLoad);". The problem is caused by using the elapsed time >> (specified by "cpu.cfs_period_us") instead of the total CPU time (specified >> by "cpu.cfs_quota_us"). Therefore, it is more reasonable to divide cpu usage >> time by "quotaNanos" instead of "elapsedNanos". > > Hao Tang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Use historical-value-based formula for both cpu-quota-based and > cpu-shares-based calculation > - rename usageTicks and totalTicks Still good. ------------- Marked as reviewed by sgehwolf (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3656