On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:19:17 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> Move the AsyncGetCallTrace method implementation into a separate method and >> wrap its call in non-assert compilation mode in `os::ThreadCrashProtection` >> like it is done in >> [JFR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/965ea8d9cd29aee41ba2b1b0b0c67bb67eca22dd/src/hotspot/share/jfr/periodic/sampling/jfrThreadSampler.cpp#L165). >> This prevents AsyncGetCallTrace from crashing on segmentation faults (but >> not on `guarantee`s). >> >> If a crash is observed, then the `num_frames` field of the trace is set to >> `ticks_unknown_state` (-7) to signal a state that cannot be properly >> handled. `ticks_unknown_state` is currently also used for signaling unknown >> thread states but this should not be a problem, as the semantic is the same. >> If `num_frames` already has an error code then this error code is not >> changed. This helps to distinguish between errors in walking threads in Java >> and non-Java mode, as `num_frames` is set there before the walking to the >> appropriate error code. >> >> _Thanks for @tstuefe for suggesting this._ > > Johannes Bechberger has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Use JavaThread::current_or_null Sorry I wasn't clear - doing this kind of change as part of the ASGCT2 JEP is what I was suggesting. But that is not a JEP that I can actively get involved in. It is really for the serviceability team and JFR team to comment on. Unfortunately folks are very busy at the moment due to the Project Loom preview, so it may be hard to get that discussion going. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8225
