On Thu, 5 May 2022 12:08:54 GMT, Johannes Bechberger <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> I would like to disagree: The abbreviation "ASGCT" is used in multiple >> places in the JVM, especially in `forte.cpp` (where "AGCT" cannot be found). > > I found "AGCT" only in a method named > "Java_MyPackage_ASGCTBaseTest_checkAsyncGetCallTraceCall". My apologies. I've always referred to it by the obvious abbreviation. But if the existing code uses ASGCT then lets be consistent. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8549
