On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:46 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]> wrote:
>> `jhsdb jstack --mixed` with coredump cannot resolve function symbol which >> has `.cold` attribute. >> >> >> ----------------- 120485 ----------------- >> "Thread-0" #24 prio=5 tid=0x00007f50dc1aa7c0 nid=120485 waiting on condition >> [0x00007f50c0d1a000] >> java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping) >> JavaThread state: _thread_blocked >> 0x00007f50e4710735 __GI_abort + 0x8b >> 0x00007f50e1e01f33 ???????? >> >> >> 0x7f50e1e01f33 was `os::abort(bool, void const*, void const*) [clone .cold]` >> and I could see it in GDB. However it has `.cold` suffix, it means the code >> has been relocated as ["cold" >> function](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-cold-function-attribute). >> In GDB, we can see the code in another area from function body as following: >> >> >> (gdb) disas 0x7f50e1e01f2e, 0x7f50e1e01f34 >> Dump of assembler code from 0x7f50e1e01f2e to 0x7f50e1e01f34: >> 0x00007f50e1e01f2e <_ZN2os5abortEbPKvS1_.cold+0>: call 0x7f50e1e01010 >> <abort@plt> >> => 0x00007f50e1e01f33: nop >> End of assembler dump. >> >> >> libsaproc.so checks address range to resolve symbol whether the address is >> in between `start` and `start + size - 1`. As you can see in assembler dump, >> the code in `.cold` section is `call` instruction, thus IP points next >> `nop`, thus we should allow address range between `start` and `start + size`. >> >> After this PR, you can see the right symbol as following: >> >> >> ----------------- 120485 ----------------- >> "Thread-0" #24 prio=5 tid=0x00007f50dc1aa7c0 nid=120485 waiting on condition >> [0x00007f50c0d1a000] >> java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping) >> JavaThread state: _thread_blocked >> 0x00007f50e4710735 __GI_abort + 0x8b >> 0x00007f50e1e01f33 os::abort(bool, void const*, void const*) [clone >> .cold] + 0x5 > > Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Clarify comment about RIP-1 fallback handling Thanks, yes we should go ahead. Is it OK to update the JBS issue and this PR title, maybe to: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27846#issuecomment-3472017765
