serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8358624: ImmutableDescriptor violates equals/hashCode contract after deserialization [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358624: ImmutableDescriptor violates equals/hashCode contract after deserialization [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8358624: ImmutableDescriptor violates equals/hashCode contract after deserialization Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8359168: Revert stdin.encoding usage in test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach010/attach010Agent00.java Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8359168: Revert stdin.encoding usage in test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach010/attach010Agent00.java Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8359168: Revert stdin.encoding usage in test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach010/attach010Agent00.java Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8359168: Revert stdin.encoding usage in test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach010/attach010Agent00.java Volkan Yazici
• Re: RFR: 8338977: Parallel: Improve heap resizing heuristics [v12] Albert Mingkun Yang
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v30] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v29] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v29] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v29] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8338977: Parallel: Improve heap resizing heuristics [v11] Albert Mingkun Yang
• RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8358815: Exception event spec has stale reference to catch_klass parameter Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v28] Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v27] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v27] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v27] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v27] Kim Barrett
• RFR: 8358970: CounterMonitorMBean.getDerivedGaugeTimeStamp() JavaDoc incorrectly documents null Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358970: CounterMonitorMBean.getDerivedGaugeTimeStamp() JavaDoc incorrectly documents null Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358970: CounterMonitorMBean.getDerivedGaugeTimeStamp() JavaDoc incorrectly documents null Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8358970: CounterMonitorMBean.getDerivedGaugeTimeStamp() JavaDoc incorrectly documents null Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8358970: CounterMonitorMBean.getDerivedGaugeTimeStamp() JavaDoc incorrectly documents null Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v26] Kim Barrett
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v25] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v24] Radim Vansa
• RFR: 8358094: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach045/TestDescription.java still times out after JDK-8357282 Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358094: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach045/TestDescription.java still times out after JDK-8357282 Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358094: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach045/TestDescription.java still times out after JDK-8357282 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358094: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach045/TestDescription.java still times out after JDK-8357282 Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8358094: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AttachOnDemand/attach045/TestDescription.java still times out after JDK-8357282 Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8358577: Test serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon01/contmon01.java failed: unexpexcted monitor object Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL with null protocol defaults to jmxmp Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL with null protocol defaults to jmxmp Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL with null protocol defaults to jmxmp [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL with null protocol defaults to jmxmp [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8347114: JMXServiceURL should require an explicit protocol Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Java API docs for javax.management.remote should not link to JMXMP [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8358701: Remove misleading javax.management.remote API doc wording about JMX spec, and historic link to JMXMP Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v22] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v22] Coleen Phillimore
• Integrated: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Aleksey Shipilev
• Integrated: 8358628: [BACKOUT] 8342818: Implement JEP 509: JFR CPU-Time Profiling Markus Grönlund
• Re: RFR: 8358628: [BACKOUT] 8342818: Implement JEP 509: JFR CPU-Time Profiling David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8358588: ThreadSnapshot.ThreadLock should be static nested class Aleksey Shipilev
• Re: RFR: 8338977: Parallel: Improve heap resizing heuristics [v10] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8338977: Parallel: Improve heap resizing heuristics [v10] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8354460: Streaming output for attach API should be turned on by default [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354460: Streaming output for attach API should be turned on by default [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8354460: Streaming output for attach API should be turned on by default [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354460: Streaming output for attach API should be turned on by default [v2] Kevin Walls
• Integrated: 8354460: Streaming output for attach API should be turned on by default Alex Menkov
• Integrated: 8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v23] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v21] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v20] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v19] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v19] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v18] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8338977: Parallel: Improve heap resizing heuristics [v9] Albert Mingkun Yang
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v17] Radim Vansa
• Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v16] Radim Vansa
• RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Afshin Zafari
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8357826: Avoid running some jtreg tests when asan is configured [v2] Matthias Baesken

• Earlier messages
• Later messages