I've just fixed it.

On 8/4/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'll double check but I think it is :)

P

On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> NP.
>
> One thing though: is the runtime classpath of the maven project used to
> load
> the servicemix configuration ?
> I haven't tested it yet, but I have not seen anything about that in the
> code.
> If we don't do that, this goal will be nearly unusable.
>
>
> On 8/4/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The archetype doesn't do much but I wanted to try and keep it so
people
> > can
> > just create the basics - and mainly so I can reference it on the
> > documentation as a quick way to get a project in the right shape?
> >
> > I wanted to keep the servicemix.xml in the resources as per the maven
> > standard directory structure.
> >
> > P
> >
> > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure for the artifact. There aren't much to do in an archetype,
> just
> > > reference the
> > > needed components afaik.  And for the default location, i would have
> > > tought
> > > to look
> > > for it in the current dir, but ... it will be configurable on the
> > plugin,
> > > so
> > > it's not
> > > a big deal.
> > >
> > > On 8/4/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do you think its worth creating an architype thats creates a
project
> > > > set-up
> > > > for embedded to run?  Also i had originally specified the default
> > > location
> > > > of the servicemix.xml as src/main/resources/servicemix.xml?
> > > >
> > > > P
> > > >
> > > > On 8/4/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The new goal was something I started,  I should be able to
finish
> it
> > > up
> > > > > and try and get it back in today :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > P
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, for examples not using the std JBI packaging, I though
> that
> > we
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > have a new goal in the
> > > > > > maven plugin to start a servicemix with a given configuration
> > > > > > file.  That
> > > > > > way, all samples would download
> > > > > > the needed dependencies via maven, and start servicemix by
> running
> > > > > > something
> > > > > > like
> > > > > >    mvn jbi:embedded
> > > > > > which would launch a servicemix configured by a
> servicemix.xmlfile
> > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > root dir.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The only problem is that examples sometimes need a client
which
> > must
> > > > be
> > > > > > compiled and launched ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting
the
> > > > examples
> > > > > > > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > > > > > > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, service engines
(both
> > > > standard
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > lightweight), but I have the feeling
> > > > > > > that we can not put thousands examples in the distribution.
> > > > > > > I'd rather go with fewer, better documented examples, which
> > would
> > > > show
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > more complex deployments (compared
> > > > > > > to a simple file-poller / file-writer example), and have
more
> > > > examples
> > > > > > /
> > > > > > > use cases on the web site only (with only the
> > servicemix.xmlconfig
> > > > > > file
> > > > > > > to show how to do something).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have began to write 2 new examples using the maven jbi
> > tooling,
> > > so
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > now have 3 of this kind:
> > > > > > >   * loan-broker (using servicemix-bpe,
servicemix-lwcontainer)
> > > need
> > > > to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > completed with some binding
> > > > > > >   * bridge (see
> > > > > > >
> > http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/creating-a-protocol-bridge.html)
> > > > > > (need
> > > > > > > to write a jms receiver of some kind
> > > > > > >   * wsdl-first (using servicemix-http, servicemix-jsr181)
> > > > > > > we also have the servicemix-web webapp which demonstrates
> > > embedding
> > > > > > > servicemix in a web app
> > > > > > > and I have just moved to the sandbox the following samples:
> > > > > > >   * soap-binding (superseeded by wsdl-first)
> > > > > > >   * http-binding
> > > > > > >   * jms-binding
> > > > > > >   * bpel-bpe (rewritten as loan-broker)
> > > > > > >   * loan-broker (which only use properties so i don' t think
> it
> > > was
> > > > a
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > > example)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any thoughts ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to