Ah, good point. Our simplest example is now running. So let's move on to next
tests. 

Thanx for your help.

Klaus.



gnodet wrote:
> 
> You may want to try with the processorName="standard" attribute on the
> JMS endpoint.  The default processor uses multiplexing, which is not
> available on all jms providers.
> 
> On 8/22/06, Klaus Alfert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanx for you quick answer, it helped a lot.
>> But I am still tumbling from exception to exception. Now,  MQ chokes on
>> the
>> send-call  :-(
>>
>>     [junit] 26441 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -
>> javax.jms.JMSException:
>> MQJMS1013: operation invalid whilst session is using asynchronous
>> delivery
>>     [junit] 26441 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> com.ibm.mq.jms.services.ConfigEnvironment.newException(
>> ConfigEnvironment.java:567)
>>     [junit] 26441 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> com.ibm.mq.jms.MQMessageProducer.send(MQMessageProducer.java:1051)
>>     [junit] 26441 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> com.ibm.mq.jms.MQMessageProducer.send(MQMessageProducer.java:1108)
>>     [junit] 26441 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>>
>> org.apache.servicemix.jms.multiplexing.MultiplexingProviderProcessor.process
>> (MultiplexingProviderProcessor.java:164)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.processExchange(
>> AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:399)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.common.BaseLifeCycle.onMessageExchange(
>> BaseLifeCycle.java:43)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.processInBound(
>> DeliveryChannelImpl.java:623)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.AbstractFlow.doRouting(
>> AbstractFlow.java:169)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaFlow.doRouting(SedaFlow.java
>> :177)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaQueue$1.run(SedaQueue.java
>> :227)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> org.apache.geronimo.connector.work.WorkerContext.run(WorkerContext.java
>> :291)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>> Source)
>>     [junit] 26442 [Thread-0] INFO  smix.console  -      at
>> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
>>     [j
>>
>> I'll take a look on it tomorrow.
>>
>> Klaus.
>>
>>
>> gnodet wrote:
>> >
>> > I' m trying to fix this problem.
>> > If will disable geronimo module until the plugin works again.
>> > [..]
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329.html#a5928806
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329.html#a5939451
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to