ServiceMix relies on ActiveMQ specific features for clusterting, so the answer is no :(
Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 3/28/06, Jason Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > This leads to another question i suppose. You can't do SM clustering > with a different MQ provider all together can you? > > Thanks, > Jason > > > On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Gerdes, Mike wrote: > > > > > I think not, you could also run ActiveMQ seperate from Servicemix, > > without any big changes. The only change will be in the top of the > > servicemix.xml where you cofigure the jms flow. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Jason Vinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. März 2006 17:30 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Clustering with ActiveMQ Bridging > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > From what i've read on this mailing list, the only way to achieve > > ServiceMix clustering is to use ActiveMQ as a message broker. Since > > we'll probably be deploying into installations that "prefer" a > > commercial grade MQ provider for external message flows, I'd like to > > use the ActiveMQ bridging functionality described at: > > > > http://activemq.org/JMS+to+JMS+Bridge > > > > Will this cause any problems with the ActiveMQ clustering that is > > built into ServiceMix via ActiveCluster? > > > > Thanks for any pointers, > > Jason > > > > > > This mail has originated outside your organization, > > either from an external partner or the Global Internet. > > Keep this in mind if you answer this message. > > > > This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an > > external partner or the Global Internet. Keep this in mind if you > > answer this message. > >
