No idea, sorry. Feel free to contribute, the date would be under your control :)
Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 3/29/06, Charles Souillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guillaume, > have you an idea of when email component will support attachments ? > > Thanks, > Charles > > Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > >Binding components is another problem. Currently, servicemix-http and > >servicemix-jms are the only BC to fully handle attachments (input and > >output). SAAJ lw component can handle attachments when sending a > >request, email has no support for them yet, and I do not know if rss > >could even support it (an entry is just a string). > > > >Just curious (I'm not a bpel expert at all), what kind of things can > >you do on attachments with bpel ? Do you use wsdl message parts to > >define them ? How can you create a non-xml attachment ? > > > >Guillaume Nodet > > > >On 3/28/06, Charles Souillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Thanks for this answer, > >> > >>I can see that XSLT is a TransformComponentSupport and that properties > >>and attachments are copied from the in NM to the out NM. > >>I can see that drools do the same thing through CopyTransformer. > >> > >>What about binding components ? > >>I am able to send a message with sm-http and in my SE, I can get the > >>attachment from the in NM. > >>I can see there is a to do in email component concerning attachments... ?? > >> > >>I can see that rss is using CopyTransformer too. > >> > >>Can you tell me if I have written something wrong above ? > >> > >>Thanks a lot ! > >>Charles > >> > >>Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>The jsr181 component should be used to defined services with POJOs. > >>>There is currently no way to access / send attachments or properties > >>>defined in the JBI exchange from these POJOs. Please, raise a JIRA > >>>for that. > >>> > >>>For other components, attachments may be forwarded or not. They > >>>usually do so if the lightweight component is a transformer or a > >>>router. Note that this is not a problem against the JBI spec as > >>>attachments are defined on a message and the component may do whatever > >>>he wants with them. > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>>Guillaume Nodet > >>> > >>>On 3/28/06, Charles Souillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi all, > >>>> > >>>>Spending time on servicemix made me wonder why there are many components > >>>>performing the same functionnalities... > >>>> > >>>>For example, I am looking at soap, WS engine, attachments... > >>>> > >>>>I think there are many ways to do soap with SM and it is not very clear > >>>>for me : > >>>> 1) why there are many ways to do soap ? > >>>> 2) how can we choose between these components ? > >>>> 3) what is the impact for users ? > >>>> > >>>>From the soap binding example, I am able thanks to a new client (saaj > >>>>client) to send a soap message with an attachment. > >>>>As you know, this message is sent to sm-http and then routed to jsr-181. > >>>>The response I get back does not contain the attachment I sent. > >>>>Is it normal ? > >>>> > >>>>I am trying to post a message containing attachments into SM and then > >>>>forward it to many other components which can modify both the message > >>>>and its attachment. > >>>>Is it possible in SM ? > >>>>I think some components are able to do that an some others not... > >>>>What about jms, mail, rss ? > >>>>Others components ? Could I find a list ? > >>>> > >>>>Thanks > >>>>Charles > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > >
