On 4/18/06, kj1003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for such quick replies. So it sounds like ServiceMix will need to be > connected to a JMS provider (remote or local) to be operational. Is that > correct?
Yes, If you don't care about reliability, recovery, clustering or XA you can just use the pure in-JVM flow (SEDAFlow) instead. > Is it possible to run workflows in a ServiceMix container (no XA) > if the connectivity with JMS Server(remote) is broken? As above; you can just disable persistence & reliabiliy if you want; or you can embed an ActiveMQ broker inside the JVM of the ServiceMix container then there is no chance of the remote server being unavailable; then you can store-and-forward from the local broker to a remote broker if needed (to survive network issues while keeping on trucking). -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
