Humm indeed you are right, i've already used this in
the past and it worked maybe something else change I
will have a look at it.

--- "Gerdes, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> oh I see :) So that is something different from what
> I thought. I have tested the https with the
> sopa-binding example and there was the jsr181
> component that generated the wsdl file.
> I get the same message as you, when I use the http
> component alone. There needs to be some kind of
> option in the configuration of the http, where you
> can set the wsdl. At least that is my understanding
> and also the point where I am standing now in my
> experiments with web services.
> But I will check the soap-binding example again with
> the https connector and try to find out how to give
> a wsdl document to the http server.
> 
> That means actually I have no real help to offer and
> that I am stuck at the same point. BTW you will get
> that message also without https and just plain http.
> At least that is behaviour in my case.
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Eric Dofonsou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 15:59
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: HTTPS support ?
> 
> 
> 
> Okay guys here is what I get when i try to access
> the
> wsdl :
> 
> HTTP ERROR: 404
> 
> No wsdl is available for this service
> 
> RequestURI=/Service/main.wsdl
> 
> Powered by Jetty://
> I will check my config and run in debug to see if I
> have everything properly configured.
> 
> --- "Gerdes, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > yes, I have accessed the wsdl with
> > https://localhost:8192/Service/?wsdl But I will
> > check it again, maybe I overlooked something
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Eric Dofonsou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 15:34
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: Re: AW: HTTPS support ?
> >
> >
> >
> > how do you input the URL :
> > <endpoint url>?WSDL
> > ex : https://localhost:8192/Service/?wsdl
> >
> > --- "Gerdes, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > hm strange, actually accessing the wsdl was my
> > main
> > > testing case..so for me it worked and I haven't
> > > encountered that problem
> > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Eric Dofonsou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 14:32
> > > An: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: Re: HTTPS support ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Back on this,
> > > i've neen doing some perliminary test and so it
> > > seems
> > > to be working fine.  However i've releaized that
> I
> > > no
> > > longer can access the WSDL (via the ?WSDL on the
> > end
> > > point URL).
> > >
> > > Is this a known issues is anybody working on it,
> I
> > > can
> > > take a look at it ?
> > >
> > > --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have cheded in the https support.
> > > > It should work, however the unit test fails
> but
> > i
> > > > think this is due to
> > > > an outdated certificate.
> > > > Please, report any problems..
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > >
> > > > On 4/25/06, Eric Dofonsou
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Guillaume,
> > > > >
> > > > > The following function ismissing from the
> > > > SoapHelper
> > > > > object :
> > > > > public MessageExchange
> > > createExchange(SoapMessage
> > > > > message)
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you just send me the code snipet ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sure. Take a look at
> > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-372
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/24/06, Eric Dofonsou
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Is there a way yo get the code so I can
> > test
> > > > it on
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > side and provide some feedback if I have
> > any
> > > ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is a patch pending that I need
> to
> > > > review
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > commit...
> > > > > > > > This should be done this week.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 4/24/06, Eric Dofonsou
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello guys,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > got a short one this time :
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Does Service mix offer HTTPS
> support
> > > via
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > servicemix-http component ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the
> > best
> > > > spam
> > > > > > > > protection around
> > > > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
> > > spam
> > > > > > protection around
> > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
> spam
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to