Commited ! Now, fault data is extracted by the provider and the fault detail content is set as the content of the jbi fault. The fault is reconstructed by the provider by using properties (code, reason, etc..) set by the provider.
Report back if you have any problems. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 5/18/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on enhancements and i'm very close to finish ... You will be notified when the jira issue change. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 5/18/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thx everything seems to be working now. > > Could you please let me know when you apply the patch > for the Jira : SM-433. > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Have you tried to compile with maven 2 ? > > Else you can find snapshot builds at > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/incubating-servicemix/3.0-SNAPSHOT/ > > > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > On 5/18/06, Eric Dofonsou < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello I did not manage to build the latest verion > > of > > > the code, > > > I checked out the latest versino from SVN and > > build > > > failed. > > > > > > I also tried to download a snapshot from : > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/repository/incubator-servicemix/distributions/ > > > But that too failed (besides the snapshots are > > old). > > > Do you have any idea where I can get a working > > buidl > > > to test ? > > > > > > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Recompile servicemix-soap also (the function is > > in > > > > this module). > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > fetch the latest code from SVN, > > > > > unable to compile. THe following funcitno is > > > > missing > > > > > from HttpEndpoint : > > > > > > > > > > httpEp.activateDynamic(); > > > > > return httpEp; > > > > > > > > > > I will try the snapshot ... > > > > > > > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > But if you use the fix i have just checked > > in, > > > > you > > > > > > should have the soap > > > > > > binding informations... > > > > > > I'm currently uploading new snapshots > > (hopefully > > > > it > > > > > > will work)... > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Eric Dofonsou < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are not going not going trhout a JSR > > 181 > > > > > > endpoint > > > > > > > we are using a HTTP endponits as both > > provider > > > > and > > > > > > > consumer : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here is my scenario : > > > > > > > I'am hosting a web service trought the BUS > > : > > > > > > > Stub client -> BUS HTTP Consumer -> BUS > > Http > > > > > > Provider > > > > > > > -> Web Service on JBoss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This works fine when we are generating the > > > > stub in > > > > > > > Java with wsimport. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Guillaume Nodet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but I think I have missed > > something. > > > > > > > > The wsdl generated by the jsr181 > > component > > > > can > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > be used as is because all > > > > > > > > binding informations are missing. > > > > > > > > However if you put a servicemix-http > > > > component > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > front, it should add all > > > > > > > > the needed binding infos. > > > > > > > > The main reason is that the jsr181 > > service > > > > is > > > > > > > > exposed in the jbi bus, not > > > > > > > > over http. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Eric Dofonsou < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay so here is what I found : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the jsr110 for handling WSDL seems to > > be > > > > > > ignoring > > > > > > > > soap > > > > > > > > > action tags when it's empty : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is an snipet of what I get from > > Jboss > > > > for > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > binding : > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > <operation name="listRoots"> > > > > > > > > > <soap:operation soapAction=""/> > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > <input> > > > > > > > > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > > > > > > > > </input> > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > <output> > > > > > > > > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > > > > > > > > </output> > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > <fault > > > > > > name="IllegalArgumentException"> > > > > > > > > > <soap:fault use="literal" > > > > > > > > > name="IllegalArgumentException"/> > > > > > > > > > </fault> > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > <fault > > > > name="ServiceFailureException"> > > > > > > > > > <soap:fault use="literal" > > > > > > > > > name="ServiceFailureException"/> > > > > > > > > > </fault> > > > > > > > > > </operation> > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I get from the WSDL > > generated > > > > by > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > BUS > > > > > > > > > for the web service : > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > <operation name="listRoots"> > > > > > > > > > <input message="tns:listRoots"/> > > > > > > > > > <output > > message="tns:listRootsResponse"/> > > > > > > > > > <fault name="IllegalArgumentException" > > > > > > > > > > > message="tns:IllegalArgumentException"/> > > > > > > > > > <fault name="ServiceFailureException" > > > > > > > > > > > message="tns:ServiceFailureException"/> > > > > > > > > > </operation> > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as you can see the <soap:operation /> > > tag > > > > is > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > present in the bus version of the WSDL > > > > this > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > be the reason why C# cannot generate > > the > > > > stub. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > think that to be cross platform the > > WSDL > > > > needs > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > include that tag even if it's emtpy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anybody here knows how to force the > > WSDL > > > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
