I would recommend looking at ServiceMix 3.0 - in this case simply changing the two references to 1099 in /conf/jmx.xml and also the port number in /conf/activemq.xml will allow you to run two instances side by side..
Cheers P On 7/7/06, Mark Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Swanson wrote: > Hello, > > ServiceMix is always binding to port 1099. > When I use rmiPort="1098" ServiceMix binds to 1099 _and_ 1098. > > The problem seems to be with activemq. It always starts listening on > port 1099 even though I changed the activemq.xml to disable jmx or use a > different port: > > <broker useJmx="false"> > <connector> > <tcpServerTransport uri="tcp://localhost:61617" backlog="1000" > useAsyncSend="true" maxOutstandingMessages="50"/> > </connector> > > <managementContext> > <managementContext connectorPort="1097"/> > <managementContext> > > Any ideas? > Note: I was able to: export JAVA_OPTS=-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=false (both jvms) and I was able to get a bit further However, I still can't get 2 servicemix implementations running on the same box (with activemq) because they both want to listen on port 34939. I don't have 34939 anywhere in my xml documents. Any ideas? Thanks. -- Free replacement for Exchange and Outlook (Contacts and Calendar) http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/tg/ WebDAV: http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/sw/webDAVDir/4000.ics VFREEBUSY: http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/sw/freebusy/4000.ifb
