Hi
Rather than extending the JBIServer class, which I first did as well, I
could also recommend the following approach:
JBIContainer container = ((ComponentContextImpl) context).getContainer();
The context you can get through injection. Iam using this approach to deploy
dynamic endpoints to ServiceMix running under JBoss.
Regards
Andreas
Timothy High wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am working on a way to access the JBIContainer from my JBoss application
> so that I can create a local client to send messages. I thought I had
> finally succeeded by adding an accessor method to the JBIServer class:
>
>
>
> public JBIContainer getJbiContainer() {
>
> return jbiContainer;
>
> }
>
>
>
> Then, my application uses the JBoss MBean server to access the
> JBIServerMBean and get the JBIContext:
>
>
>
> private JBIContainer getJbiContainer() throws
> MalformedObjectNameException {
>
> MBeanServer server =
> MBeanServerLocator.locateJBoss();
>
> JBIServiceMBean proxy = null;
>
> String objName =
> "org.apache.servicemix:service=JBIService";
>
> ObjectName objectName = new ObjectName(objName);
>
> if (server.isRegistered(objectName)) {
>
> // Get a type-safe dynamic proxy
>
> proxy = (JBIServiceMBean)
> MBeanServerInvocationHandler.newProxyInstance(
>
>
> (MBeanServerConnection) server, objectName,
>
>
> JBIServiceMBean.class, false);
>
> } else {
>
> throw new
> IllegalArgumentException("MBean " + objName
>
> + " does not
> exist");
>
> }
>
> return proxy.getJbiContainer();
>
> }
>
>
>
> So far, so good. However, when I try to send a message using this
> container, it can't locate the endpoint or service requested. After some
> debugging, I discovered that the JBIContainer registry is empty. In fact,
> what the JBoss deployer is doing is creating a separate SpringJBIContainer
> for each ServiceMix SA I deploy (actually, I'm currently just testing with
> simple XML configurations):
>
>
>
> public void installServiceMixXml(String archive) {
>
> // Ok, we are going to use the spring
> infrastructure
>
> // to create a container
>
> log
>
> .info("Creating ServiceMix
> JBI installer from XML [" + archive
>
> +
> "]");
>
> List processors = Arrays.asList(new Object[] { new
> XBeanProcessor() });
>
> containerMap.put(archive, new
> ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(archive,
>
> processors));
>
> }
>
>
>
> So, none of the deployed assemblies have access to any other assemblies -
> each one has effectively its own separate container. Is this the expected
> behavior? Is this how the stand-alone ServiceMix server works? I had
> assumed that you would want a single registry so that components in one
> assembly could communicate with services in another.
>
>
> Could someone please clarify this for me?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Timothy High
>
> Software Engineering
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> Sakonnet Technology
> Centro Empresarial Mourisco
> Praia de Botafogo 501 1°Andar
> Bloco A - Torre Pão de Açúcar
> 22250-040 - Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil
> www.sknt.com <http://www.sknt.com/>
>
> +55 (21) 2586 6102 direct
> +55 (21) 2586 6001 fax
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JBI-Containers-and-the-JBoss-Deployer-tf1998766.html#a5498168
Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
