This is now fixed in svn head. See http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-535
On 8/7/06, hiyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get the error 'Service class cannot be abstract' when I add a serviceInterface to the configuration. There apprears to be a bug logged against xfire for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-306 <sm:activationSpec> <sm:component> <jsr181:component> <jsr181:endpoints> <jsr181:endpoint annotations="jsr181" service="xfire:DirectoryService" endpoint="DirectoryService" serviceInterface="com.company.webservices.DirectoryServiceInterface" pojo="#directoryService"> </jsr181:endpoint> </jsr181:endpoints> </jsr181:component> </sm:component> </sm:activationSpec> -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spring-transaction-proxy-with-jsr181-POJO-tf2064171.html#a5690463 Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
