Download the latest servicemix-web war and use these jars instead:
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/samples/servicemix-web/3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/servicemix-web-3.0-incubating-20060826.104511-8.war
On 8/29/06, *Charles Souillard* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Here is the list of jars included in my webapp (I have taken those
given
in the build of SM... and I have added xstream-1.1.2.jar,
stax-utils-snapshot-20040917.jar, jaxen-1.1-beta-8.jar):
activeio-core-3.0-beta3.jar
derby-10.1.1.0.jar
jencks-1.1.3.jar
wsdl4j-1.5.2.jar
activemq-core-4.0.jar
geronimo-activation_1.0.2_spec-1.0.jar
jmdns-1.0-RC2.jar
wstx-asl-2.9.3.jar
activemq-ra-4.0.jar
geronimo-connector-1.0.jar
lingo-1.0.jar
xalan-2.7.0.jar
aopalliance-1.0.jar
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.0.jar
log4j-1.2.12.jar
xbean-2.1.0.jar
backport-util-concurrent-2.1.jar
geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
mx4j-3.0.1.jar
xbean-kernel-2.4.jar
commons-beanutils-core-1.7.0.jar
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
mx4j-remote-3.0.1.jar
xbean-server-2.4.jar
commons-betwixt-0.7.jar
geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec- 1.1-20060323.jar
quartz-1.5.1.jar
xbean-spring-2.4.jar
commons-collections-3.1.jar
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
servicemix-components-3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
xercesImpl-2.7.1.jar
commons-digester-1.6.jar
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
servicemix-core-3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
xml-apis-1.3.02.jar
commons-lang-2.1.jar
geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.0.jar
servicemix-jbi-3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
xmlpublic-2.1.0.jar
commons-logging-1.0.3.jar
geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
servicemix-services-3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
xstream-1.1.2.jar
commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
geronimo-saaj_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
spring-2.0-m5.jar
commons-pool-1.2.jar
geronimo-transaction-1.0.jar
stax-api-1.0.1.jar
concurrent-1.3.4.jar
jaxen-1.1-beta-8.jar
stax-utils-snapshot-20040917.jar
You are right, I don't have xbean-2.6-SNAPSHOT, I should add it and
remove another one ?
I think these questions are very easy for you and I don't want to make
you wasting your time but there are a lot of jars and I don't know
whci
one is replacing another...
Thanks a lot for these quick answer...
Charles
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Which version of xbean is included in your web app ?
> You must have xbean-2.6-SNAPSHOT inside it.
> The stack trace shows that you use the old bugged version.
>
> On 8/29/06, *Charles Souillard* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Guillaume,
>
> I had already tried that and I always get the following error...
> you can find in attach the web.xml file I get in WEB_INF dir
>
> 2006-08-29 11:21:08,880 : ApplicationContext.log : Loading
Spring
> root
> WebApplicationContext
> ERROR - ContextLoader - Context
initialization failed
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not find valid
implementation
> for: 2.0-m5
> at
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.createBeanDefinitionReader
> (XmlWebApplicationContext.java:84)
> at
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions(XmlWebApplicationContext.java:63)
> at
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.refreshBeanFactory
> (AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.java:89)
> at
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:278)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.support.AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.refresh
> (AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.java:156)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.createWebApplicationContext
(ContextLoader.java:246)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext
> (ContextLoader.java:184)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized
(ContextLoaderListener.java:49)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java
> :3727)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start
(StandardContext.java:4162)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.JOnASStandardContext.start(JOnASStandardContext.java:252)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal
(ContainerBase.java:759)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.access$000(ContainerBase.java:121)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$PrivilegedAddChild.run
> (ContainerBase.java:143)
> at
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java
:737)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild
(StandardHost.java:524)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.doRegisterWar
(CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:570)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.web.AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.registerWar
> (AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:854)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.doStart(AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:383)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.doStart
> ( CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:297)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.service.AbsServiceImpl.start(AbsServiceImpl.java:80)
> at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java
:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:585)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.wrapper.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.invoke(CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.java
:157)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.wrapper.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.start
> (CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.java:528)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.service.ServiceManager.startServices
(ServiceManager.java:336)
> at
org.objectweb.jonas.server.Server.start(Server.java:546)
> at
org.objectweb.jonas.server.Server.main(Server.java:181)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0
(Native Method)
> at
>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>
> at
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java
:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at org.objectweb.jonas.server.Bootstrap.main
> (Bootstrap.java:97)
> 2006-08-29 11:21:09,381 : StandardContext.listenerStart :
Exception
> sending context initialized event to listener instance of class
> org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener
> java.lang.IllegalStateException : Could not find valid
implementation
> for: 2.0-m5
> at
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.createBeanDefinitionReader(XmlWebApplicationContext.java:84)
> at
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions
> (XmlWebApplicationContext.java:63)
> at
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.refreshBeanFactory(AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.java:89)
> at
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh
> (AbstractApplicationContext.java:278)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.support.AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.refresh
(AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.java:156)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.createWebApplicationContext
> (ContextLoader.java:246)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext(ContextLoader.java:184)
> at
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized
> ( ContextLoaderListener.java:49)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3727)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start
(StandardContext.java:4162)
>
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.JOnASStandardContext.start(JOnASStandardContext.java:252)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal
(ContainerBase.java:759)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.access$000(ContainerBase.java:121)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$PrivilegedAddChild.run
(ContainerBase.java:143)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged
(Native Method)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:737)
> at
>
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:524)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.doRegisterWar
> (CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.java :570)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.registerWar(AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:854)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.web.AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.doStart
> (AbsJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:383)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.doStart(CatalinaJWebContainerServiceImpl.java:297)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.service.AbsServiceImpl.start
> (AbsServiceImpl.java:80)
> at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:585)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.wrapper.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.invoke(CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.java
> :157)
> at
>
org.objectweb.jonas.web.wrapper.catalina55.CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.start(CatalinaJWebContainerServiceWrapper.java:528)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.service.ServiceManager.startServices
> (ServiceManager.java:336)
> at
org.objectweb.jonas.server.Server.start(Server.java:546)
> at
org.objectweb.jonas.server.Server.main(Server.java:181)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native
> Method)
> at
>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at
> org.objectweb.jonas.server.Bootstrap.main (Bootstrap.java:97)
> 2006-08-29 11:21:09,389 : StandardContext.start : Error
listenerStart
> 2006-08-29 11:21:09,391 : StandardContext.start : Context
> [/SM-2006-08-29] startup failed due to previous errors
> 2006-08-29 11:21:09,393 : ApplicationContext.log : Closing
Spring root
> WebApplicationContext
>
>
> Regards
> Charles
>
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > The xbean version used in latest snapshot incorporate the fix.
> > So you can not rely on servicemix class which has been
removed,
> > but you must use the
> > org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext
> > in your web.xml.
> > For an example, take a look at
> >
> >
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
> <
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml>
> >
> <
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
> <
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/samples/servicemix-web/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml>>
> >
> >
> > On 8/29/06, *Charles Souillard* <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> >
> > It is not a problem for me to use the following class
but please
> > give me
> > a bit more information on how to do that and which
changes I
> have
> > to do.
> > I am not familiar with xbean at all.
> > I give you the thread dealing with that problem :
> >
> >
> > In the mean time, you can use the
> > org.apache.servicemix.xbean.XmlWebApplicationContext
class.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> > On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> >
> > The patch is applied in xbean, but ServiceMix does not
use
> the latest
> > version yet.
> > It should be done asap.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/06, Charles Souillard <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to deploy the SM web app into my J2EE app
> server and
> > I am
> > > getting an error :
> > > java.lang.IllegalStateException : Could not find valid
> > implementation
> > > for: 2.0-m5
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.createBeanDefinitionReader
> (
> >
> > > XmlWebApplicationContext.java :84)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.xbean.spring.context.XmlWebApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions
> >
> > > (XmlWebApplicationContext.java:63)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.refreshBeanFactory
> > (
> >
> > > AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.java:89)
> > > at
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh
(
> > > AbstractApplicationContext.java :278)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.web.context.support.AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.refresh
(
> >
> > > AbstractRefreshableWebApplicationContext.java :156)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.createWebApplicationContext
> >
> > > (ContextLoader.java:246)
> > > at
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader.initWebApplicationContext
(
> > > ContextLoader.java:184)
> > > at
> > >
> >
>
org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized
>
> >
> > > (ContextLoaderListener.java:49)
> > > at
> > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(
> > > StandardContext.java :3727)
> > > at
> > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start
> (StandardContext.java
> > > :4162)
> > >
> > > I saw that some bugs were created for that problem :
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-21
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-458
> > >
> > > In the XBEAN-21 bud, it is written that the patch is
> applied bug
> > I still
> > > get the error with the latest sn from 2006/07/18.
> > > I tried to replace in my eclipse project the linked java
> file but
> > > nothing change. This error make me impossible using the
> web app
> > in my
> > > J2EE app server.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I missed something in the way to bypass the
error
> so can
> > you
> > > tell me what I have to do ?
> > > Can you give me the exact status of this bug ? (it is
> still open
> > in jira
> > > but a patch exist....)
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot
> > > Regards,
> > > Charles
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > > The latest snapshots use xbean-2.6-snapshot (which
should be
> > upgrade to
> > > xbean-2.6 final in a few days) which should fix any
xbean
> related
> > > problem.
> > > Which specific problem are you refering to ?
> > >
> > > On 8/29/06, Charles Souillard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I can only find here 3.0M2 release which is not a good
> one for
> > me as you
> > >> said :
> > >> "make sure you use a post M2 release (a snapshot)".
And
> when I
> > choose
> > >> development snapshot, I can find snapshots from :
> > >> 06/20 = the same date as the 3.0M2
> > >> and then snapshots from 08/08 and later.
> > >> I know that the xbean problem was present ont the
07/19 so it
> > means I
> > >> can not find any build later than 3.0M2 and before
the xbean
> > problem
> > >> occurs ?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Charles
> > >>
> > >> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >> > Have you tried
> http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/download.html ?
> > >> >
> > >> > On 8/29/06, Charles Souillard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hi Guillaume,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I can see in the mailling list that the 3.0 M2 was
> released
> > on the
> > >> 20th
> > >> >> of june. Is that correct ?
> > >> >> I am currently using a personnal build from the 19th
> of june...
> > >> >> As I explained in a previous thread (07/19/06),
I can not
> > use for the
> > >> >> moment the current nightly build because of the
error
> > concerning the
> > >> >> xbean jar file...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Can you tell me if I can find (and where) a
nightly build
> > containing
> > >> the
> > >> >> fix without the xbean problem ?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks a lot
> > >> >> Charles
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >> >> > Implementing a factorial using sendSync is the
worst
> possible
> > >> >> example !
> > >> >> > This is the one I used in a previous thread to
> explain how
> > you
> > >> could
> > >> >> > easily deadlock ServiceMix :) Unless you have an
> > unlimited number
> > >> >> > of threads available.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Anyway, to answer your questions, there is one
and only
> > one channel
> > >> >> > for each component, and a message exchange can
not be
> > *reused*.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Also, make sure you use a post M2 release (a
> snapshot) as a
> > >> critical
> > >> >> > bug has been fixed which was causing deadlocks
when
> exchanges
> > >> >> > were send from a component to itself (it may
be another
> > endpoint,
> > >> >> > but in the same component).
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On 8/24/06, Charles Souillard
> > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Hi all,
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I am currently working on a SE. My problem is to
> > understand how
> > >> >> channels
> > >> >> >> are managed into the jbi container. My use
case is the
> > following :
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> the NMR calls my BPEL SE. I receive a
> messageExchange and I
> > >> send the
> > >> >> xml
> > >> >> >> document to my BPEL engine. In some cases the
process
> > must call
> > >> some
> > >> >> >> other services (invoke statement of the BPEL)
which
> are
> > deployed
> > >> >> on the
> > >> >> >> NMR. In my particular case, I am trying to
execute a
> > factorial
> > >> >> service
> > >> >> >> (it give the mathematical result of the factorial
> operand
> > : 10!
> > >> for
> > >> >> >> example). I can summarize my problem as the
following :
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> NMR - 1 > BPEL SE - 2 > BPEL engine - 3 >
BPEL SE -
> 4 >
> > NMR - 5 >
> > >> >> BPEL
> > >> >> >> SE - 6 > BPEL Engine - 7 > BPEL SE ....
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> So is ity mandatory to use the same channel /
> exchage in
> > all of
> > >> these
> > >> >> >> flows ?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> In my case, I use the given exchange for the
arrow
> #1 and
> > for
> > >> >> arrow #4
> > >> >> I
> > >> >> >> can get the BPEL SE component channel and then I
> create a new
> > >> >> >> exchange...
> > >> >> >> Is that correct ?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> In that case, when I perform the following
code, after
> > the arrow
> > >> >> #4 the
> > >> >> >> message is sent but no response is given in
return
> to my RR
> > >> call...
> > >> :
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Element body = <myBody>
> > >> >> >> URI mep = URI.create ("
> > http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";);
> > >> >> >> MessageExchangeFactory factory =
> > channel.createExchangeFactory();
> > >> >> >> MessageExchange me = factory.createExchange(mep);
> > >> >> >> me.setInterfaceName(new
> QName(portTypeNS,portTypeName));
> > >> >> >> QName serviceQN = new
QName(serviceNS,serviceName);
> > >> >> >> me.setService(serviceQN);
> > >> >> >> me.setEndpoint(this.component.getComponentContext
> > >> >> >> ().getEndpoint(serviceQN,portName));
> > >> >> >> me.setOperation(new
QName(operationNS,operationName));
> > >> >> >> NormalizedMessage nm = me.createMessage();
> > >> >> >> me.setMessage(nm, "in");
> > >> >> >> nm.setContent(new DOMSource(body));
> > >> >> >> boolean res = this.channel.sendSync(me);
> > >> >> >> System.out.println("after sendSync, res =
"+res);
> > => I get
> > >> >> res =
> > >> >> >> true
> > >> >> >> if (!res) {
> > >> >> >> throw new
> > Exception("OrchestraMessageListener.onMessage, Timeout
> > >> on
> > >> >> >> sending request/response message");
> > >> >> >> }
> > >> >> >> if (me.getStatus() == ExchangeStatus.ACTIVE) {
> > >> >> >> if (me.getFault == null) {
> > >> >> >> nm = me.getMessage("out");
> > >> >> >> if (nm != null) {
> > >> >> >> newBody = ((Document)
> > >> >> >> this.transformer.toDOMNode
(nm)).getDocumentElement();
> > >> >> >> System.out.println("newBody = "+newBody);
> > >> >> >> }
> > >> >> >> }
> > >> >> >> }
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I have tried to activate and understand
traces but
> it is
> > hard for
> > >> >> me...
> > >> >> >> I can give then to you if you have an idea ?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl - SendSync
> > >> >> >> ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0 in
> > >> DeliveryChannel{Orchestra}
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl - Sent:
> > MessageExchange[
> > >> >> >> id: ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0
> > >> >> >> status: Active
> > >> >> >> role: consumer
> > >> >> >> interface:
> > {urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> service:
> > >>
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServiceServiceBP
> > >> >> >> endpoint: FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> operation:
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}process
> > >> >> >> in: <?xml version="1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?><process
> > >> >> >> xmlns="urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap"><value
> > >> >> >> xmlns="">2.0</value></process>
> > >> >> >> ]
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DefaultBroker - Routing
> exchange
> > >> >> >> MessageExchange[
> > >> >> >> id: ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0
> > >> >> >> status: Active
> > >> >> >> role: provider
> > >> >> >> interface:
> > {urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> service:
> > >>
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServiceServiceBP
> > >> >> >> endpoint: FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> operation:
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}process
> > >> >> >> in: <?xml version=" 1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?><process
> > >> >> >> xmlns="urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap"><value
> > >> >> >> xmlns=""> 2.0</value></process>
> > >> >> >> ] to:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>
ServiceEndpoint[service={urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServiceServiceBP,endpoint=FactorialServicePT]
>
> >
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - SedaFlow - Called
> Flow send
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl -
Waiting for
> > exchange
> > >> >> >> ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0
(10f29f) to be
> > answered in
> > >> >> >> DeliveryChannel{Orchestra} from sendSync
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - SedaQueue -
> > >> >> >>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> dequeued
> > >> >> >> exchange: MessageExchange[
> > >> >> >> id: ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0
> > >> >> >> status: Active
> > >> >> >> role: provider
> > >> >> >> interface:
> > {urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> service:
> > >>
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServiceServiceBP
> > >> >> >> endpoint: FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> operation:
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}process
> > >> >> >> in: <?xml version=" 1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?><process
> > >> >> >> xmlns="urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap"><value
> > >> >> >> xmlns="">2.0</value></process>
> > >> >> >> ]
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl -
Processing
> inbound
> > >> exchange:
> > >> >> >> MessageExchange[
> > >> >> >> id: ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0
> > >> >> >> status: Active
> > >> >> >> role: provider
> > >> >> >> interface:
> > {urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> service:
> > >>
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}FactorialServiceServiceBP
> > >> >> >> endpoint: FactorialServicePT
> > >> >> >> operation:
{urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap}process
> > >> >> >> in: <?xml version=" 1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?><process
> > >> >> >> xmlns="urn:factorialService:bpel:bsoap"><value
> > >> >> >> xmlns=""> 2.0</value></process>
> > >> >> >> ]
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl -
Notifying
> exchange
> > >> >> >> ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0(10f29f) in
> > >> >> >> DeliveryChannel{Orchestra} from
> > processInboundSynchronousExchange
> > >> >> >> DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl -
Notified:
> > >> >> >> ID:frec445363-48773-1156420954393-5:0(10f29f) in
> > >> >> >> DeliveryChannel{Orchestra} from sendSync
> > >> >> >> after sendSync, res = true
> > >> >> >> status = Active
> > >> >> >> fault = null
> > >> >> >> error = null
> > >> >> >> out = null
> > >> >> >> newBody = null
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Thanks a lot
> > >> >> >> Charles
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
