I think I found the answer elsewhere in the forums -- I should use: jms?failover://(tcp://masterhost:61616,tcp://slavehost:61616)?randomize=false
dajevu wrote: > > Hi, > > I wanted to use JMS for my NMR flow. I see the instructions indicate doing > something like: > > <sm:container flowNames="jms?jmsURL=tcp://localhost:61616/"> > ... > </sm:container> > > I presume in the above, the jsmURL is pointing to an existing instance of > ActiveMQ running on either a local or remote host. > > However, I'd like to use the Master/Slave configuration of ActiveMQ 4.x. > It specifies that the client would use something like this as the URL: > > failover://(tcp://masterhost:61616,tcp://slavehost:61616)?randomize=false > > I've tried something like this for the NRM, but it I got a stack dump: > > <sm:container > flowNames="failover://(tcp://masterhost:61616,tcp://slavehost:61616)?randomize=false"> > ... > </sm:container> > > Can I assume that this isn't supported? Are there any other possible > solutions? I've already got my ActiveMQ working in Master/Slave, so I'd > prefer to use that for our HA (we have clients connecting already using > the failover protocol). > > Thanks so much in advance! > > jeff > > p.s., any ETA on the official 3.0 release? I think you guys are doing > fantastic work, btw! > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-NMR-Flow-Question-tf2197576.html#a6082776 Sent from the ServiceMix - User forum at Nabble.com.
