Thanks a lot.
You mean like this?
me.setOutMessage(answer);
getDeliveryChannel().sendSync(me);
I tried this but actually, I had the impression that within sendSync, the
call to "waitForExchange" is waiting for ever.
Anything else that I'm missing?
gnodet wrote:
>
> If you receive a synchronous transactional exchange, you
> need to answer using sendSync, so that the transaction
> is also conveyed synchronously back to the consumer
> component.
> You can check if the jbi exchange is synchronous and transacted
> with the following code:
> boolean txSync = exchange.isTransacted() &&
> Boolean.TRUE.equals(exchange.getProperty(JbiConstants.SEND_SYNC));
>
> If txSync is true, you MUST use sendSync to send the answer.
>
> On 9/20/06, Martin Landua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have written a polling component which generates messages that it is
>> sending to its delivery channel synchronously. It operates on a InOut
>> Message Exchange.
>> Also, I have created an OutBinding component, which is supposed to create
>> an
>> answer to the message that it receives. The answer is being sent through
>> the
>> answer method of the OutBinding component.
>> Now it appears to me that everything works fine as long as the polling
>> component does not create a transaction. If it does, the answer() method
>> actually throws an exception, because it cannot find an appropriate flow
>> that can handle this message exchange.
>> From what I can tell from the sources, the SedaFlow checks whether it can
>> handle a ME. And it does it like this:
>>
>> public boolean canHandle(MessageExchange me) {
>> if (isPersistent(me)) {
>> return false;
>> }
>> if (isClustered(me)) {
>> return false;
>> }
>> if (isTransacted(me)) {
>> if (!isSynchronous(me)) {
>> // we have the mirror, so the role is the one for the
>> target
>> component
>> if (me.getStatus() == ExchangeStatus.ACTIVE) {
>> return false;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>>
>> The problem here is that the answer() method actually clears the
>> SEND_SYNC
>> property, therefore the ME appears to be async although it is not. And
>> why
>> does this test only happen when transactions are enabled?
>>
>> Am I using the wrong flow?
>> Please note that I'm running ServiceMix in JBoss using the JBoss deployer
>> (all built from SVN-Head).
>>
>> Any advice?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martin
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Answering-synchronous-transactional-InOut-MEP-tf2307890.html#a6416047
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Answering-synchronous-transactional-InOut-MEP-tf2307890.html#a6416569
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
