Thanks for your reply.
gnodet wrote: > > The main point of a message filter is to drop unwanted exchanges. > The problem is that you can not simply drop InOut exchanges, > as a response is required. We could set a fault or an error, but in this > case, it would be a validating component, not a message filter. > > On 10/3/06, Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When I tried out the Message Filter pattern in the EIP Component, it >> seemed >> to only accept In Only and Robust In Only MEPs. >> >> When I was testing the EIP Component with the Message Filter pattern and >> an >> In Out MEP, i received an exception notifying me that it only can handle >> In >> Only and Robust In Only MEPs. >> >> I'm asking because the documentation of this pattern in the EIP Component >> does not specify this. Is there a particular reason or concern for >> designing >> the pattern in that way? >> >> Regards, >> H. Robbins >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/EIP---Message-Filter-tf2376851.html#a6622385 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EIP---Message-Filter-tf2376851.html#a6623519 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
