Thank you for providing detail explanation. It really helps me understand.
Thanks!
Another question, in the LoanBroker class after processing loan quote, it
invokes send(ag.request). How does it know it is going to put the out the
message in the ActiveMQQueue ("demo.org.servicemix.output") from the server
side? If it is not define in the server side, what if there are multiple
applications being deployed, how does it know which output queue the out
message should go to?
I am trying to create a InOnly Message Exchange example that use the same
loan broker pattern.
1. I have the Client-to-JmsServiceComponent interaction.
2. JmsServiceComponent-to-Controller interaction.
3. Controller to DataManagementComponent interaction.
The Controller is like the Loan Broker (provider of the JmsServiceComponent
and consumer of the DataManagementComponent). DataManagementComponent is
the provider. I implemented the DataManagementComponent by extending the
TransformComponentSupport and implementing the transform method. My
question is, am I extending the right class and implement the right method?
Also, where do I call the done(exchange) for the DataManagementComponent?
Another question is for the JMSClient, since this is an InOnly Message
Exchange, do I still need to use MultiplexingRequestor.newInstance(factory,
inQueue, outQueue)? Because I don't think I will have an outQueue.
Thanks for your help in advance!!!
gnodet wrote:
>
> On 10/6/06, dadade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to understand how ServiceMix works with JMS and
>> WS-Notification/Web Service.
>> The questions I am asking might be stupid, but just trying to understand.
>>
>> Looking at the loan broker example:
>>
>> The LOANBROKER_NS is the namespace, does this has to be a accessable URI?
>>
>> The line :
>> super(new QName(Constants.LOANBROKER_NS, Constants.LOANBROKER_SERVICE),
>> "input");
>>
>> Is "input" the endpoint? Where is input begin defined? Is it a reserved
>> keyword?
>
> "input" is indeed the endpoint name, but in the configuration, only the
> service
> name is specified for routing.
>
> <sm:activationSpec componentName="loanBrokerJmsBinding"
> destinationService="lb:loan-broker">
>
> so the endpoint name is not used in this case
>
>>
>> I am looking at the Interaction between JmsServiceComponet to LoanBroker.
>> So after
>> loan broker process the input request, it is send out to Credit Agency by
>> invoking send(inout). How is send(inout) invoke the transform method in
>> the
>> CreditAgency class?
>
> Lightweight components implements the MessageExchangeListener.
> All jbi exchanges sent to a component go to the onMessageExchange
> method. The loanbroker sends an InOut exchange asynchronously
> to the specified service using
> new QName(Constants.LOANBROKER_NS, Constants.CREDITAGENCY_SERVICE)
> The JBI NMR will send the exchange to the matching service name:
>
> <sm:activationSpec componentName="creditAgency"
> service="lb:credit-agency">
>
> which is the loanbroker.CreditAgency component.
> This component extends TransformComponentSupport and thus will receive
> the request in its transform method.
>
>>
>> Then if I look at the CreditAgency class, the transform method takes
>> MessageExchange exchange, NormalizedMessage in, and NormalizedMessge out
>> as
>> arguments. Which argument in the transform method does the Inout inout
>> refers to?
>
> InOut, InOnly, RobustInOnly and InOptionalOut are all interfaces
> deriving from MessageExchange. So the inout exchange sent by the
> loanbroker is received in the "exchange" parameter. The "msg" message
> created by the loanbroker (which is the "in" message of the InOut
> exchange)
> is mapped to the "in" parameter of the transform method. The "out"
> parameter is created by the TransformComponentSupport.
>
>>
>> Why doesn't the CreditAgency class need to extends ComponentSupport but
>> just
>> the TransformComponentSupport?
>
> TransformComponentSupport extends ComponentSupport and provides
> additional
> methods to ease the writing of simple components that mainly support a
> request / response pattern. The loan broker is more complicated, so it
> can
> not benefit from the implementation of TransformComponentSupport.
>
> The main difference is that the CreditAgency only acts as a provider
> (it receives a jbi exchange, process it and send it back), whereas
> the loanbroker acts as both a provider and a consumer (it creates
> exchange and send them to other components).
>
>>
>> Why doesn't the CreditAgency class need the onMessageExchange method?
>
> Because it is implemented by the TransformComponentSupport
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.0-incubating/site/servicemix-core/apidocs/org/apache/servicemix/components/util/package-frame.html
> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.0-incubating/site/servicemix-core/xref/org/apache/servicemix/components/util/TransformComponentSupport.html
>
> As can see, TransformComponentSupport implements the onMessageExchange
> and derived classes just need to implement the transform method.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Implementation-tf2392384.html#a6670308
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Implementation-tf2392384.html#a6729245
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
