(I correct: jms handles synchronous flow)

mart wrote:
> 
> I assume jms would not work better with FTP since it is asynchronous;
> anyway I will try to setup something else to review JMS/JCA flows.
> 
> mart wrote:
>> 
>> I don't know if this may change anything but in fact I am using the VFS
>> component. Would JMS flow work?
>> 
>> gnodet wrote:
>>> 
>>> Currently, the ftp component only send  JBI exchanges synchronously,
>>> so the JCA flow will never accept those exchanges and they will use
>>> the SEDA flow.  Of course, this should change.
>>> 
>>> On 11/3/06, mart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This lack of documentation is confusing me as well. I have a current
>>>> workflow
>>>> that seems to use SEDA. JCA seems to be configured in the default
>>>> servicemix.xml file:
>>>>
>>>>         <sm:flows>
>>>>          <sm:sedaFlow />
>>>>           <sm:jcaFlow bootstrapContext="#bootstrapContext"
>>>>                       connectionManager="#connectionManager"
>>>>                       jmsURL="tcp://localhost:61616" />
>>>>         </sm:flows>
>>>>
>>>> How can I make my current workflow use JCA (for persistence &
>>>> reliability,
>>>> maybe clustering in the long term)? Where do I have to set up my
>>>> exchange ?
>>>>
>>>> My current workflow is ftp => drools based router => different
>>>> Transform
>>>> Component => Different destinations (mail/FTP) and I have many cases
>>>> where
>>>> my message can be lost.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any info.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gnodet wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Not at all.
>>>> > But do not blame yourself as this is not documented :(
>>>> > When choosing a flow, several QoS requirements will be checked:
>>>> >   * synchonous / asynchronous: if the exchange was sent using
>>>> sendSync or
>>>> > send
>>>> >   * persistent: if the message need to be peristent
>>>> >   * transactional: if the message is enlisted in an xa transaction
>>>> >   * clustered: if the destination endpoint is clustered (activated on
>>>> > another clustered jbi container)
>>>> >
>>>> > The transactional attribute can be set by setting the transaction in
>>>> the
>>>> > needed property of the exchange (
>>>> > MessageExchange.JTA_TRANSACTION_PROPERTY_NAME).  This can also be
>>>> done
>>>> > automatically by servicemix using autoEnlistInTransaction attribute
>>>> on the
>>>> > container (if an xa transaction is running, the property will be
>>>> set).
>>>> > Persistent feature may be set using the persistent attribute on the
>>>> > container, on the activation spec or on the exchange itself (
>>>> > org.apache.servicemix.JbiConstants.PERSISTENT_PROPERTY_NAME).
>>>> >
>>>> > Each flow will check if it can fullfill the needed requirements, and
>>>> the
>>>> > first flow to answer yes will be used (this can be customized).
>>>> > For example, the jms flow will reject any transactional exchange,
>>>> whereas
>>>> > the jca flow will reject any synchronous exchange and seda/st flow
>>>> will
>>>> > reject any persistent or clustered exchanges.
>>>> > Note that you can force the NMR to choose a given flow by using the
>>>> > JbiConstants.FLOW_PROPERTY_NAME property on the exchange.
>>>> >
>>>> > The only combination that is not handled at all by servicemix is:
>>>> > clustered
>>>> > + transactional + synchronous.
>>>> >
>>>> > However things should be improved regarding to clustering: the
>>>> seda/st
>>>> > should accept clustered exchanges if the target endpoint is also
>>>> activated
>>>> > locally.
>>>> >
>>>> > Hope this helps,
>>>> > Guillaume Nodet
>>>> >
>>>> > On 5/17/06, William Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Sorry, I swear this is my last post on this topic!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Requesting a particular Q0S - is this done when creating the
>>>> >> exchange? i.e. getExchangeFactory().createInOnlyExchange() would use
>>>> >> seda by default while
>>>> getExchangeFactory().createRobustInOnlyExchange
>>>> >> () would use jca?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> B.J.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On May 16, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Configuration is not difficult.
>>>> >> > Try something like
>>>> >> >  <sm:container flowNames="seda,jca?jmsURL=tcp://localhost:61616"
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Depending on the requested QoS for the exchange, one of the flow
>>>> will
>>>> >> > be choosen.
>>>> >> > You can change the default implementation by setting the
>>>> >> > defaultFlowChooser property on the Broker -- i have just seen that
>>>> i
>>>> >> > forgot to add getter / setter :(
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Anyway, if you use a sendSync on jca flow, an exception should be
>>>> >> > thrown.  If you have multiple flows (including a seda / st flow),
>>>> >> > sendSync calls should use the seda flow.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > If your problem is the http binding, you could try using the
>>>> >> > servicemix-http component which uses send and not sendSync.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Cheers,
>>>> >> > Guillaume Nodet
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On 5/17/06, William Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >> Success! Got the JCA flow up and running - thank you very much. I
>>>> did
>>>> >> >> run into that problem with sendSync though. I use an httpBinding
>>>> >> >> component to introduce some messages. It uses sendSync
>>>> internally,
>>>> >> >> and now I get sporadic io errors when I attempt to use it.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I may simply choose to use a jmsbinding for this message
>>>> insertion,
>>>> >> >> but you mentioned that multiple flows can be configured - does
>>>> this
>>>> >> >> mean that the httpBinding could use seda or jms, while everything
>>>> >> >> else uses jca? I haven't seen an example of this - if its not too
>>>> >> >> much trouble, could you elaborate?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Thanks again for all your help so far.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> B.J.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Guillaume Nodet
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-on-JMSFlow-cluster-configuration-tf1630154s12049.html#a7155558
>>>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Questions-on-JMSFlow-cluster-configuration-tf1630154s12049.html#a7162748
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to