Never mind that, found http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-510 SM-510 .
jep wrote: > > thanks, in my case i think i'm better of using jms binding for the > addressing and leaving the flows unclustered. > > is there a way to have message properties transported when using > servicemix-jms? > > > gnodet wrote: >> >> The main point when using jms or jca flow is that two jbi endpoints >> activated with the same service name / endpoint name are considered >> as a unique endpoint, with load-balancing between them. If you do not >> want this behavior, you need to give them different names, as direct >> jbi endpoint addressing is not supported by these flows. >> >> On 11/13/06, jep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> when using jmsFlow, is it possible to prevent certain components from >>> being >>> clustered? i want to be able to address components (that exist in a >>> number >>> of clustered containers) relative to their container without having to >>> give >>> them unique endpoints. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/jmsFlow-component-addressing-tf2620581s12049.html#a7312674 >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jmsFlow-component-addressing-tf2620581s12049.html#a7333020 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
