Thanks Guillaume! However, I'd like to comment on the fact that ActiveMQ is in fact clustered by default. The "traditional" way of installing servers is that they are stand-alone, but the ESB is a bit different of course. I'm not saying it is wrong to have ActiveMQ clustered by default, a good solution would be comments on how to turn it off in the activemq.xml for instance. ;)
Kind regards, /Eyji gnodet wrote: > > You need to remove the <networkConnector/> tag > and also the discoveryUri attribute on the transportConnector. > That way, the ActiveMQ instances won't be clustered. > > On 11/16/06, Eyji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> We have installed a SM development and test environments on the same >> physical >> machine as single instances, separated by port number entries of course. >> The >> problem we have now is that when we send JMS messages to, say, the test >> instance, the message is received by the development instance and vice >> versa >> as if in a clustered environment. >> Among other things, I tried to comment out the <networkConnector >> uri="multicast....> entry in the activemq.xml without success. We use a >> JCA >> flow for our messages if that is a helpful hint. >> >> Greatful for any help in this matter, >> /Eyji >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Involuntary-distribution-of-messages-tf2641701s12049.html#a7373986 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Involuntary-distribution-of-messages-tf2641701s12049.html#a7375223 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
